Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM03540
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide Code Review check list 2) Indicate existing fire hydrant locations with dimensions to property lines. 3) Fire Department lock box required at gate to allow access for Fire Deparmwent apparatus |
| 06/22/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 3. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the locations, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 4. Revise plant symbols to indicate the ultimate size by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover per DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.c. 5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 6. Revise the site and landscape plans to provide curbing or other suitable barrier for landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area. LUC 3.7.2.3.B 7. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of 34 square feet in area and 4 feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree 8. The measurement is always within the planter area and does not include any material which defines the outer edge of the unpaved area" per DS 2-06.3.3.C. Include inside dimensions of the narrow planters within vehicle use area on landscape, and site plans Indicate the area in square feet. 9. Indicate the location, height and type of required screening elements on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.3. 10. Revise note pertaining to decomposed granite to read: All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. 11. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 12. Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 13. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/23/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 |
| 07/17/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: MPE DATE: July 18, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 1134 W. Miracle Mile New Storage Building (Full Code Compliance) Site plan T06CM03540 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Hydrology Report. The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of each with your next submittal. Hydrology Report: The Hydrology Report is not accepted as is. Please verify that the submitted report, dated 10/22/02, is still valid and reflects existing and proposed conditions with a cover letter dated and sealed within the last 2 months. Also, if using the same earlier-dated report, please provide the entire report. Pages 1 and 2 were missing from this one. Please ensure the Hydrology Report discusses the potential erosion of the slope located north of the property and proposes erosion protection measures, if necessary. Site Plan: 1. There are significant discrepancies between the Keynotes as described and the Keynotes called out on the SP. Please verify the Keynotes, ensuring that each Keynote is appropriately called out and references the numbered description. 2. Keynote 34 "HAND PLACED ROCK RIPRAP ON FILTER FABRIC - d50 = 4", t=8" " is shown north of the property border within the property boundaries of the Fairview Manor Mobile Home Park. Please verify if the riprap is existing or proposed. If the riprap is proposed, please address the following: 2.1. Is riprap required in the Hydrology Report as an erosion protection condition? 2.2. An easement will need to be recorded in order to construct and maintain the riprap in perpetuity. 3. Please provide a detail for the refuse container enclosure, including access to and space for maneuverability. Please see the attached Container Enclosure detail. 4. Please revise the Legend and provide unique symbols for individual descriptions. Please ensure the symbols are correctly drawn on the SP. 5. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with Standard Detail 207. Please provide a detail or call out the standard detail, noting truncated domes where required. 6. Please provide the basis of bearings and the basis of elevation, including the vertical datum used. 7. Please provide flow arrows to indicate stormwater drainage after development. Please provide finished grades as contours or spot elevations to verify the drainage pattern. 8. All commercial development larger than one acre in size and located within a non-designated basin are required to incorporate a 5-year threshold retention system which will, at a minimum, retain the stormwater discharge volumetric difference between existing and developed conditions. Aggressive water harvesting may significantly reduce the volume of retention required. Please provide either an appropriately sized retention basin and/or a detailed water-harvesting plan. 9. Please provide estimated cut and fill quantities in cubic yards, listed as separate amounts. 10. Please provide the dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks. 11. The dimensions called out on the SP for the existing and future Sight Visibility Triangles (SVTs) are unclear and do not scale correctly. Please verify and revise as needed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Suzanne Bohnet, CFM, Engineer Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/09/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: KELLY ELECTRIC WAREHOUSE T06CM03540 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP with your next submittal. This plan has been reviewed for full code compliance. Greater then 25% expansion. 2. There are numerous discrepancies between the keynotes as described and the keynotes called out on the SP. Please clarify or revise as necessary. Future comments may be forth coming. 3. All lettering and dimension on all sheets shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Please revise. D.S. 2-05-2.1.C 4. Provide sheet index on sheet C.1. 5. Both the site plan and detail sheets are labeled "C.1", please clarify. 6. The property lines shown on the site plan do not match the property lines shown on the Pima County Assessor's Record Map, please clarify. 7. This site contains two (2) separate parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. Copies of the lot combo covenant & tax combo attached. 8. Provide required zoning setbacks and distances between buildings dimensioned. D.S. 2-02.2.1.7 9. Provide off-street parking, including fully dimensioned layout, location, parking spaces size and number, and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces. D.S. 2-02.2.1.8 10. Post barricades or wheel stop curbing must be provided to prevent parking vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscape, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Pedestrian circulation must be addressed including material & access ramps, continuous circulation… See redline. D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 11. Parking space details show curb stops, provide dimension for location of curb stop. 2'-6" minimum form tire side of stop to front of space. D.S. 3-05.2.3.2 12. Provide off-street bicycle parking; include materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. .D.S. 2-02.2.1.9 13. I appears the site visibility triangle (SVT) sizes are incorrect, see engineering comments. D.S. 2-02.2.1. Parking spaces are not allowed within the SVT's. 14. There is no parking allowed within a site visibility triangle (SVT). There is currently parking shown within the future SVT. D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1 There are two options. The parking plan can be revised to meet the requirements of the code. The parking shown can remain as shown and an MS&R plan showing how the parking will work when the future R.O.W. is taken and a recorded MS&R covenant will need to be provided. 15. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.20 16. Provide dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs. D.S. 2-02.2.1.21 17. If applicable provide existing and proposed lighting layout and type. D.S. 2-02.2.1.25 18. The site is zoned C2 & MH1. The MH1 area is located in upper northeast corner of the parcels. Contact Bill Marum @791-5550 ext. 2203 to obtain the dimensions of the MH1 zoning. D.S. 2-02.2.1.28 19. Construction Services in not an allowed use in MH1 L.U.C. 2.3.7. Section 1.3.5 of the L.U.C. allows for a 25' encroachment into the MH1 zone if the requirements in this section are met. Please provide the required documentation showing that this meets L.U.C. 1.3.5. It also appears that the proposed parking shown in the MH1 zone exceeds the 25' encroachment. Revise the plan as required. 20. Floor areas for existing and proposed on-site plan do not match what is shown in the "GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL", please revise. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 21. Revised F.A.R. once gross floor area is corrected. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 22. Parking calculation appears to be incorrect; calculation shows 42 provided and there are 43 on the plan. Please revise. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 23. The calculation for the MS&R adjustment factor for parking is in error based on the lot square footage and future MS&R. Please revise and clearly show the area of R.O.W. to be taken. 24. Base on section 3.3.4 L.U.C. the required bicycle parking is 8% of the total vehicle parking spaces provided all Class 2. The calculations shows 50% Class 1 & 50% Class 2, please revise the calculations to show the required and provided. 25. Provide a percentage of building expansion calculation. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 26. Parcel numbers shown on plan do not match the Pima County Assessor's Records, please revise. See redline. 27. Existing office needs a loading zone - show location and demonstrate maneuverability. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm03540.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 08/16/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/17/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/17/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |