Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - SITE
Permit Number - T06CM03381
Review Name: REVISION - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 7798 E. Speedway Blvd. T06CM03381-R Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 27, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with development standards 2-02 site content and specifications. Additional review for compliance with development standards, 2-08, 2-09, 3-01, and 3-05 has been made. 2. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP with your next submittal. 3. A copy of the last approved site plans is required with the next submittal. This includes the plan approved by Patricia Gehlen and the plan approved prior to that site plan. Comments may be deleted once the last approved plans are submitted or additional comments may be forth coming. 4. All text and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. 5. Provide a property description on the plan. D.S. 2-02.1.A.2 6. Provide the project address on the plan. D.S. 2-02.1.A.3 7. Provide the Floor Area Ration (FAR). D.S. 2-02.2.A.3 8. Provide a vehicle use area expansion calculation for the Fuel Center. D.S. 2-02.2.A.6 9. For the proposed fuel station provide a note stating "RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, GENRAL MERCHANDISE SALES, "28", Subject to Sec.3.5.9.2.6. Sheet A1.1 1. Floor Plan Keynotes: a. Keynote 2 references "Detail 12/A1.3", there is no detail 12 on sheet A1.3. b. Keynote 9 references "Details 1, 2, 3/A1.6", there is no details 1, 2, 3 on sheet A1.6. c. Keynote 11 references "Details 15, 16, 17, 18/A1.6", there is no details 15, 16, 17, 18 on sheet A1.6. d. Keynote 20 references "Detail 22/A1.6", there is no detail 22 on sheet A1.6. e. Keynote 24 references "Detail 19/A1.6", there is no detail 19 on sheet A1.6. f. Keynote 26 references "Detail 7/A1.6", there is no detail 7 on sheet A1.6. 2. There are numerous details called out on sheet A1.1 which reference details on sheet A1.6, there are no details on sheet A1.6. Please clarify. 3. Provide dimension and bearings for all property lines. D.S. 2-02.1.A.5 4. Provide the height of the proposed fuel center canopy & kiosk. D.S. 2-02.1.A.6 5. Provide required zoning setbacks. D.S. 2-02.1.A.7 6. Provide typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 7. The detail call outs for the Class 2 bicycle areas area incorrect, revise. D.S. 2-02.1.A.9 8. It appears that there is Class 2-bicycle parking located just south of the existing Burger King adjacent to the NO WORK areas. If this is correct call it out as such. D.S. 2-02.1.A.9 9. Provide both existing and future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) for all ingress/egress PAALs. D.S. 2-02.1.A.10 10. The crosswalk, which runs from the former Los Betos building area east and then north to the access ramp, presents a dangerous condition for pedestrian circulation/accessible route. It is recommended that the pedestrian circulation/accessible route be revised so that it runs direction north from the former Los Betos, perpendicular to the east west PAAL to connect to the sidewalk along Speedway Blvd. The handicapped space should be relocated along with the pedestrian circulation/accessible route. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 11. Clearly identify all curb access ramps or areas where sidewalks are flush with pavement. It is unclear how the pedestrian circulation/accessible route which runs north from the existing 1-STORY SMALL STORES to the former Los Betos area, works. There is no curb access ramp called out on the north side of the PAAL. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 12. There is handicapped parking and access aisle shown at the south end of the parking located along the east side of the 1-STORY SMALL STORES but no access ramp is shown, clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 13. At the southwest end of 1-STORY SMALL STORES there is an area which appears to contain electrical transformers. This area appears to encroach into a parking space. If this encroachment reduces the width of the parking space to less then 8'-6" the parking space is not usable. Dimension the parking space and if the dimension is less the 8'-6" revise the parking calculation to reflect the elimination of one space. D.S. 2-02.2.A.12 & D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 14. It is unclear where the van accessible handicapped parking spaces are located, clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 15. There are three (3) handicapped parking areas just to the north of the Fry's main entrance. The eastern most of the three (3) handicapped parking areas does not show a curb access ramp or sidewalk flush with the pavement. There are keynotes, which do not point to the correct area. Clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 16. The pedestrian circulation/accessible route, crosswalk, which starts at the northeast corner of the proposed Fry's expansion runs across the PAAL to a sidewalk has Keynote 11 which should show an access ramp but known is indicated. Clarify. This sidewalk then head east to end of the landscape area, at this point it is unclear if the sidewalk is flush with the pavement or if there is a curb access ramp. Clarify. Truncated domes are required at both areas. This pedestrian circulation/accessible route continues east across the PAAL where it connects with a "concrete pedestrian access lane walkway cut into the asphalt", is the concrete asphalt walkway flush with the pavement? If the walkway is flush the truncated domes will be required where the crosswalk meets the concrete. If this is a raised sidewalk then an access ramp with truncated domes are required. Clarify. At the east end of the concrete asphalt walkway the same condition exist. Clarify. This pedestrian circulation/accessible route then turn north and crosses another PAAL and appears to connect to a sidewalk, an access ramp with truncated domes will be required at this point. The sidewalk in this area scales at 3 foot wide and per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A this sidewalk should be 4 foot wide. This sidewalk is eliminating one (1) parking space, revised the parking calculation to reflect the elimination of this parking space. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 & D.S. 2-02.2.A.4 17. The pedestrian circulation/accessible route shown running from the east side of Brake Max to the handicapped parking spaces and then connecting to the sidewalk which provides access to the sidewalk which parallels Pantano Rd. can not be located between the handicapped parking spaces and the PAAL providing access. D.S. 2-08.4.1.F. Access ramps with truncated domes are required. D.S. 2-02.1.A.12 18. Provide location, type, size and height of existing and proposed signage. D.S. 2-02.1.A.13 19. The loading spaces shown at the southeast corner of the existing Fry's are shown within the proposed expansion. Clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.A.14 20. The loading space shown at the Brake Max is shown as existing, per the 2005 aerial there is not a loading zone in this area. Clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.A.14 21. Provide street names on the plan for Speedway and Pantano, also identify them as MS&R routes. D.S. 2-02.1.A.18 22. Dimension the right-of-ways, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-ways. D.S. 2-02.1.A.18 23. If applicable show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.1.A.20 24. Provide the existing zoning of the parcels and surrounding parcels. D.S. 2-02.1.A.28 25. The refuse container located near the southwest corner of Fry's appears to have bollards blocking the gates. Clarify. D.S. 2-02.1.A.32 26. The above comments should be on Sheets A1.2 through A1.5. Sheet A1.2 1. The horizontal dimensions do not align with the items that they are dimensioning. This includes detail 1. Revise plan. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 2. Provide dimensions for the parking spaces located north of the proposed fuel station and former Los Betos. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 3. Dimension the required 1-foot setback from the northeast corner of the fuel station canopy to the PAAL. D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 & D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 4. Provide a dimension for the PAAL west of the 1-STORY SMALL STORES. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 5. It appears that there are structural elements adjacent to the parking along the east side of the 1-STORY SMALL STORES. Provide Barriers/wheel stops per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C. 6. Provide dimensions on all proposed sidewalks. 2-02.1.A.12 7. Detail 2/A1.2 is not shown on the plan. Clarify. 8. Provide street name on the plan for Speedway Blvd. And identify it as an MS&R route. D.S. 2-02.1.A.18 Sheet A1.3 1. The horizontal dimensions do not align with the items that they are dimensioning. This includes details 1 & 2. Revise plan. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 2. Provide a dimension for the Ingress/Egress PAAL located along Speedway. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 3. Detail 2/A1.3 does not meet the minimum requirements for a van accessible handicapped parking space. Per ICCANSI A117.1-2003 the minimum parking space size is 96" with the accessible aisle width of 96". Revise the detail. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 4. Provide dimensions on all proposed sidewalks. 2-02.1.A.12 Sheet A1.4 1. The horizontal dimensions do not align with the items that they are dimensioning. This includes detail 1. Revise plan. This D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 2. Provide dimensions on all proposed sidewalks. 2-02.1.A.12 Sheet A1.5 1. Provide the setback from the proposed Fry's expansion to the south property line. D.S. 2-02.1.A.7 2. Provide a dimension for the curb to curb PAAL located near the southeast corner of the Brake Max. It appears this does not meet the minimum width of 24' for a two-way PAAL. D.S. 2-02.1.A.8 3. Provide dimensions on all proposed sidewalks. 2-02.1.A.12 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm03331-R.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 12/06/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Incite Architects DATE: December 6, 2006 Architects 7065 N. Oracle Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 SUBJECT: Saguaro Vista Shopping Center, 7798 E. Speedway Blvd. Site plan T06CM03381 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 10. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 12. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 13. Show Site plan number (T06CM03381) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 14. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 15. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 16. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 17. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 19. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) is required during Grading plan submittal. See SWPPP requirements listed below. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193. 20. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7798 E. Speedway Blvd. Site |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/11/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |