Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM02686
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/03/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/03/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Landscaping is required along retention basin side slopes, bottom and periphery. Plant materials used in basins shall withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre must be provided, 33% of tress shall be 24" box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree is required per DS 10.01 and LUC 3.7.4.3.A. Revise landscape plan to include basin(s) treatment. 2. Revise the landscape and site plans to provide curbing or other suitable barrier for landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. |
| 07/03/2006 | JMORALE1 | ADA | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 07/03/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add a note stating that development is subject to Annexation Ordinance No. 7090 which established zoning in the Country Club/Valencia Annexation District. Add the annexation condition which this development is subject to, which states that in the I-1 (R) zoned portions the building height is limited to 39 feet and prohibits uses listed in attachement "B" of the ordinance. Revise the maximum allowed height in the Land Use Code Summary to read 39 feet per the annexation condition. 2. Revise the MS&R street perimeter yard building setback (east) from Alvernon Way to state that it is required to be the greater of 21 feet or the height of the exterior building wall measured from the back of future curb location. LUC 3.2.6.5 3) In the LUC Summary table provide a proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) based on the proposed building gross floor area divided by the site area. DS 2-02.2.2.A.3 4) The proposed Civic protective services use is not listed as an allowed use in the I-1 zone. A rezoning of the site may be necessary for the proposed use. Contact the Zoning Administrator's office for a written interptetation that the proposed use may allowed in the I-1 zone. 5) The pedestrian circulation system must be continuous and provide a connection to the right-of-way for Alvernon Way. Based on the legend symbol for sidewalkon sheet C1.0, the vehicular use area contains sidewalk within required PAALs. Sidewalks are to be used for pedestrian access only. Revise plan legend to indicate that some of these "sidewalk" areas are actually concrete aprons. 6) The parking calculation indicates that there are 8 standard vehicle parking spaces located within the building. Parking bays where fire service vehicles park may not be counted toward meeting required parking. Revise plan if necessary. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 |
| 07/03/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise keynote 19 on sheet C1.2 to indicate that the handicap ramp detail 6 is found on sheet C1.3. On sheet C1.3 correct the detail to indicate that it is detail #6/C1.3 |
| 07/03/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 8, 2006 SUBJECT: Fire Station #22 TO: Michael Becherer, WSM Architects LOCATION: 6810 S Alvernon Way, T15S R14E Sec16, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM02686 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan, landscape plan and drainage report. The drainage report was reviewed for site plan purpose only. The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A: Revise the last paragraph in Section 1.1of the drainage report to state that 5-year threshold retention is required along with the 15% reduction in existing flow. DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3: Provide a new drainage area map for the V channel calculation sheet in Appendix F of the drainage report showing how the 1.84 acres was calculated. The Developed Area Figure 2-E shows that the drainage area B-3 has 3.69 acres draining towards the V channel and basin. Explain the difference in watershed area used in the V channel calculation sheet versus the developed drainage area. DS Sec.10-02.11.4.4.2.1: Provide outlet protection for the 2-18" RCP that are located underneath both ingress/egress. Review of the culvert design calculations in Appendix F show that the outlet velocity for both culverts exceed 4 feet per second (fps). Per the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management outlet protection of dumped rock riprap must be installed if the velocity is greater than 4 fps. DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Provide a minimum of one 15-foot wide vehicular access ramp into the basin for maintenance purposes. The maximum roadway or access ramp slope shall not exceed 15%. Label the width and slope of the access ramp on plan view. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.B.1: Revise the drainage report to include routing calculation sheets for the detention basin 2-18" outlet pipes for sizing and design constraints to show that detention requirements have been met. DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.B.2: Describe Figure 2 on page 5 of the drainage report. Figure 2 needs to be indexed and the stationing provided should be identified and shown in plan view. DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow from the roof drainage is contained under the sidewalk. Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the scuppers that are called out in the Key Note #26 on sheet C1.2 of the proposed site plan. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the future sight visibility triangles on Sheet A1.0, specifically at the south ingress/egress to show the required 345-foot near side length. Refer to DS Sec3-01.5.1 for sight visibility triangle procedures and criteria. Also revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles shown on the site plan. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Show a continuous pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the proposed building and the circulation path located on Alvernon Way. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide the required maneuvering area for the loading zone that is shown on the site plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a detail for the proposed scupper, Key Note #26 on Sheet C1.2, which is used for collecting onsite roof drainage at the pedestrian sidewalk. Any scupper proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise Key Note #16, and all other applicable notes, to read "Sheet C1.3" for all detail references. DS Sec.2-01.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to reflect the existing and future sight visibility triangles that are shown on the site plan. Provide a note on the landscape plan to state no structures and vegetation is allowed within 30" to 72" in height and will not be placed within the sight visibility triangles. Remove any proposed vegetation within the sight visibility triangle areas that obstructs sight visibility. DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Alvernon Way, the proposed sidewalk is labeled as 4-foot on Sheet A1.0. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. Label the proposed sidewalk to be constructed as 6-foot. DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2: Provide a note on the site plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide the Geotechnical Report referenced in General Note #4 on Sheet C1.0. The geotechnical evaluation needs to address the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. GRADING PLAN: DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project due to the cut and fill quantities provided in General Note #19 on Sheet C1.0. Submit a copy of the grading plan with text upon completion and submittals of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf Provide a general note that references the City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). GENERAL COMMENTS: Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. Please provide a revised site plan, a revised landscape plan, a revised drainage report, and a geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, landscape plan, drainage report, and geotechnical report reviews. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/2006 | ADRIANNE OLIVO | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/03/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |