Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM02635
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/09/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 20, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM02635 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1421 South 9th Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL: LAST APPROVED SITE PLAN 1. Site plan will not be approved until lot split process is complete with the City of Tucson and recorded with Pima County. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.2 2. This comment has not been fully addressed. A continuous pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all structures to the ROW. Provide a 4' sidewalk within the pedestrian circulation path. Provide pedestrian circulation with a 4' sidewalk to connect both structures on lot 3A. See zoning comment 6. Revise. DS 2-08.3.1., DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. 3. Revise the pedestrian circulation with a 4' sidewalk on lot 2 behind the parking space to be in a different location. Pedestrian circulation behind a parking space imposes a safety hazard. Revise the proposal to no provide pedestrian circulation behind a parking space. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. 4. All easements shown on the site plan must have the recordation information; docket and page. Provide the docket and page on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 5. The utilities shown on lot 3A must have an easements to provide access to the lines. Graphically shown the easements on the site plan and provide the recordation information; docket and page. 6. Dimension from street centerline of 9th Avenue to the existing sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 7. Provide the datum for the Bench Mark. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 8. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including the handicap access aisle. All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. It is acknowledged a detail has been provided however detectable warnings have not been shown in the ROW. Show on the site plan access ramps within the ROW. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 9. The following comment has not been addressed. New projects consisting of 3 or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability. Be aware refuse vehicles require 36' inside radius and 50' outside radius. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2. Proposals not meeting the requirements of D.S. 6-01, will require a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR). Please contact Patricia Gehlen, Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Manager for DSMR submittal criteria. It is recommended to also consult with Andy Vera from Environmental Services at 791-5543 extension 1212. |
| 03/14/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
| 03/14/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1421 S. 9th Avenue T06CM02635 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.), Land Use Code (LUC) & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 2. This comment has not been fully addressed. Zoning acknowledges the receipt of a lot split application and 3 legal descriptions but the reconfiguration has not been processed through the City of Tucson. This process must be completed prior to approval of this site plan. It appears that a lot line reconfiguration has been done for the three (3) parcels. Provide documentation that the lot line reconfiguration has been approved. Additional comments may be forth coming. 3. This comment has not been addressed. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan or, plans, which show the existing buildings. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan showing the three (3) structures, four (4) units called out as "PREVIOUSLY APPROVED". Additional comments may be forth coming. 4. This comment has not been fully addressed. Zoning acknowledges the dimensioned parking layout. Provide the typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces and the access to. Fully dimension the parking layout; provide typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces and the access to. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 5. This comment has not been fully addressed. Provide a dimensioned detail for class 2 bicycle parking spaces which meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised standards can be found at the DSD web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf. Per D.S, 2-09.4.3 the proposed bicycle parking facility will be separated from vehicular parking and drive areas by a barrier or sufficient distance to prevent damage to the parked bicycles. The proposed location does not meet this requirement. Provide materials for lighting, paving and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles the rack supports. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 6. It is unclear how the proposed pedestrian circulation/accessible route connects to the sidewalks adjacent to 9th Avenue and maintains the accessible route at the curb returns, clarify. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.F the proposed pedestrian circulation/accessible route, that runs between the parking space located west of the existing building located on Lot 2, and the proposed PAAL cannot be located between the PAAL and the parking space, revise the plan. A continuous pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all public access areas to the adjacent street. D.S. 2-08.3.1 Provide a sidewalk from the buildings on lot 3A to the sidewalk adjacent to 9th Avenue. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 7. This comment has not been fully addressed. There is no clear accessible route from the handicapped parking space to the existing home shown on lot 3A or to the duplex shown on lot 3, clarify. Show how the handicapped parking space is accessible to all buildings on site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 8. The "34' UTILILTY EASEMENT & INGRESS/EGESS EASEMENT" needs to include all required pedestrian circulation. Also utility easements are required for all the utilities that run across Lot 3A from the alley to Lots 2 & 3. Show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with recordation information docket and page. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 There appears to be a discrepancy in the legal descriptions compared to the property boundary bearings. The provided legal descriptions reference "00º27'03" W upon the West line of said Lot 2", the bearing for the West line of Lot 2 is shown as "00º25'09". Please Clarify. This includes cross access, parking, pedestrian & utility easements. 9. This site is being designed to function as a multi family (apartment complex) site, based on the propose PAAL and parking. This said the parking is then based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. Revise the parking calculation to reflect the number of bedrooms in each unit. Additional comments maybe forth coming. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm02635-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/23/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |