Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM02635
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/12/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning comments |
| 10/12/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1421 S. 9th Avenue T06CM02635 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 09, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.), Land Use Code (LUC) & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 2. Based on what appears to be the addition of the PAAL and parking which would constitute a more then 25% expansion of vehicle use area. 3. It appears that a lot line reconfiguration has been done for the three (3) parcels. Provide documentation that the lot line reconfiguration has been approved. Additional comments may be forth coming. 4. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan showing the three (3) structures, four (4) units called out as "PREVIOUSLY APPROVED". Additional comments may be forth coming. 5. The location map is unreadable, remove the parcels from the location map and center the project within the location map. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 6. The plan shows a PAAL being used to access three parcels, a street will be required. This street must meet D.S. 3-01.0. See Engineering comments. 7. Fully dimension the parking layout; provide typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces and the access to. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 8. A vehicle use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parking vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping, overhanging adjacent unpaved areas and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 9. Provide materials for lighting, paving and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles the rack supports. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 10. A continuous pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all public access areas to the adjacent street. D.S. 2-08.3.1 Provide a sidewalk from the buildings on lot 3A to the sidewalk adjacent to 9th Avenue. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 11. A four (4) foot sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to the PAAL on the side where buildings are located. D.S. 2-08.4.1.B. Provide a sidewalk between the PAAL and the existing buildings on Lot 2 & 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 12. Show how the handicapped parking space is accessible to all buildings on site. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 13. Dimension the right-of-way of 9th Avenue. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 14. Show all easements of record graphically on the plan along with recordation information docket and page. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 There appears to be a discrepancy in the legal descriptions compared to the property boundary bearings. The provided legal descriptions reference "00º27'03" W upon the West line of said Lot 2", the bearing for the West line of Lot 2 is shown as "00º25'09". Please Clarify. This includes cross access, parking, pedestrian & utility easements. 15. The provided building coverage 4,033 sq. ft. does not match the total square footage when each building square footage is added up the total is 4,035 sq. ft. Revised the calculation to reflect what is shown on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 16. Revised the lot coverage calculation to reflect the correct amount of building area. 4,035 sq. ft. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 17. Provide a building and lot area expansion calculation. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm02635.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/16/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | It appears that the site does contain Protected Native Plants choose appropriate selection on the application for exception include activity and date of submittal. |
| 10/16/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Verify calculations for landscape border along 9th Ave. There appears to a deficiency with plant coverage. 2. Areas where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular or pedestrian traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. Provide protection for landscape borders on the site and landscape plans. 3. It appears that the site does contain Protected Native Plants choose appropriate selection on the application for exception include activity and date of submittal. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/09/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 9, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM02635 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1421 South 9th Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL: LAST APPROVED SITE PLAN 1. The location map is not legible. See Zoning comment number 5 and revise site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.4. 2. This development is proposing to access three separate parcels off of one access point, because of this a street is required. Refer to Development Standard 3-01 for street criteria. 3. The sight visibility triangle(SVT) is not labeled correctly. An example of the correct label is, "185' SVT." Revise appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10. 4. Provide post barricades or wheel stop curbing to prevent the parked vehicles from damaging adjacent walls, landscaping, buildings and from driving over the property line. DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. 5. A continuous pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all structures to the ROW. Provide a 4' sidewalk within the pedestrian circulation path. Revise. DS 2-08.3.1., DS 2-02.2.1.A.12. 6. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. The refuge area may have a roof for shade, provided it contains a sidewalk and pedestrian access which is unobstructed and is set back one (1) foot from the PAAL. (See Figure 1.) Indicate compliance with this standard on the site plan. DS 3-05.2.2.B.1. 7. Provide existing drainage patterns. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 8. Provide proposed finish grades through out the site. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16. 9. Cut and fill quantities are required to be on the site plan. Provide the amount of cut. If cut equals zero, indicate on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 10. Indicate if 9th Avenue is public or private. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 11. Provide the docket and page for 9th Avenue. DS 2-02.2.1.A.18. 12. All easements of record must be graphically show on the site plan with the docket and page. The 24' utility, ingress, egress easement and the 5' utility and pedestrian easement depicted on the plan indicates the easements was previously approved. If the easements has been previously approved the docket and page should be provided on the site plan. Provide the docket and page on the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 13. 2' of the pedestrian and utility easement on the north side of the PAAL is within two parking spaces. This is a safety hazard. Revise the plan or clarify. 14. Identify the type of easement shown on the back parcel (lot 3A). DS 2-02.2.1.A.20. 15. Label the ROW dimension correctly. Simply labeling the width of the half ROW is not sufficient. The dimension must be label as to what the dimension pertains to. An example of an appropriate label for a dimension is, "39.6' Existing half ROW." Revise the site plan appropriately. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 16. Dimension from street centerline of 9th Avenue to the existing curb and sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 17. Call out the width of the sidewalk with the ROW. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 18. Per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG) for an ingress/egress to a local street 18' curb returns are required. Indicate 18' curb returns for the ingress/egresses to 9th Avenue. TMAG was adopted on March 17, 2003 by Mayor and Council. 19. After reviewing an aerial photo it appears there is not enough distance between the existing structures for a 24' PAAL. It appears that there is only 20'. Clarify. DS 3-05. 20. Provide the datum for the contours, include book and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. 21. Identify the height of the existing fence located on the north boundary. DS 2-02.2.1.A.22. 22. It appears after reviewing an aerial photo there is a wall along the east and south property line. Clarify. If there is an existing wall, call out on the site plan and indicate the width. DS 2-02.2.1.A.22. 23. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including the handicap access aisle. All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Revise the site plan to comply with this standard. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 24. New projects, including mobile home parks, consisting of 3 or more dwelling units will provide centralized on-site refuse storage, collection and pickup areas. Indicate refuse container location, size and access thereto fully dimensioned. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability. Be aware refuse vehicles require 36' inside radius and 50' outside radius. Indicate a refuse enclosure detail as per D.S. 6-01.4.2. 25. Indicate the use of water harvesting for supplemental irrigation purposes. LUC 3.7.4.5.B. 26. Please note that subsequent comments may be necessary upon resubmittal, depending on the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 11/16/2006 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |