Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T06CM02576
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/22/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
11/22/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
11/22/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
11/22/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The water calculations provided are incomplete; the developed length of piping is not included. The minimum available water pressure is to be used for the calculations, not the maximum water pressure. Reference Sections 610.4, 610.5, 610.6, 610.7, 610.8, and 610.9, UPC 2003. 2. Provide a cleanout for the floor sink located on the north side of the kitchen; it appears to have dropped off of the last submittal. Reference Section 707.4, UPC 2003. 3. The cleanouts provided for the hand sinks are too small to service the 3" drain piping to which they are connected. Each change of pipe size, for which a different size cleanout is required, must be provided with the properly sized cleanout. Reference Section 707.11, UPC 2003. |
12/06/2006 | LEERAY HANLY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE CORRECT CODE ANALYSIS FOR BUILDING AND MIXED OCCUPANCIES. CLARIFY HOW 1 HOUR OCCUPANCY SEPERATION WAS ARRIVED AT. TABLE 302.3.2 FO 2003 IBC REQUIRES 2 HOUR OCCUPANCY SEPERATION BETWEEN B AND M OCCUPANCIES. EXCEPTION TO 302.3.2 FOR 1 HOUR REDUCTION DOES NOT APPLY WHEN SPRINKLERS ARE USED FOR AREA INCREASES. 2) SHELL BUILDING PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE 1 HOUR DEMISING WALLS. PLEASE JUSTIFY "EXISTING" CONDITION AND PROVIDE FIRESTOP INFORMATION/DETAILS FOR MEMBRANE PENETRATIONS. 3) REFERERENCE CORRECTION NOTE DATED 10-20-06: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL FOR HOOD CONNECTION. CLARIFY HOW NOTE ON ROOF SKETCH "EXISTING JOIST OK" WAS ARRIVED AT. CLARIFY HOW NOTE "(4) WOOD JOIST FOR SUPPORT HOOD" WAS ARRIVED AT. DETAIL CONNECTION OF "HANGING ANGLE DETAIL" TO HOOD AND TO STRUCTURAL FRAME. PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR DEAD LOADS, LIVE LOADS, BENDING MOMENTS, ETC. FOR HOOD AND BLOWERS AS RELATED TO EXISTING STRUCTURE. |
12/10/2006 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide set of previously approved plans. This is a requirement for any re-submittal. Electrical Plans Examiner held plans from Nov. 29 until Dec 1 in order to allow Applicant, Jerry Curtis, to locate stamped/signed/approved plans. Per telephone conversation, the plans were held until Friday, December 1. |
12/11/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/20/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
12/26/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
12/26/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |