Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM02475
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Access on west side of building must comply with IFC 2003, Section 506.1 and C.O.T. amendments to IFC, Section 503.6.2 |
| 05/11/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 05/11/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way with approval by the City Engineer per LUC 3.7.2.4. Include approval documentation for use of ROW. 2. The required ground coverage for street landscape borders must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting revise square footage of plant material as necessary. 3. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify the screen for vehicle use area. 4. Indicate both the proper and common name of existing vegetation to remain in place DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e. 5. Revise the site and landscape plans to provide curbing or other suitable barrier for landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. 6. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension planter accordingly within vehicle use area. 7. All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate treatment for all the landscaped areas. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/22/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 23, 2006 SUBJECT: T.A. CAID Inc.- Site Plan Review TO: Metro Permit Express LOCATION: 2405 E Ganley Rd, T15S R14E Sec08, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green and Elizabeth Eberbach, P.E. ACTIVITY: T06CM02475 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan, landscape plan and Drainage Statement. The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Provide a copy of the original approved Master Drainage Report for the site that addresses all 100-year flows for the offsite detention/retention basin and the onsite/offsite drainage. This report should address that the detention/retention requirements for the critical basin have been met. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.6: The Master Drainage Report should address any calculations for the wall openings to show that the existing wall that crosses the drainage easement does not obstruct or divert flow. If the Master Drainage Report does not address wall openings than a separate Drainage Statement must provide calculation showing that the 100-year flow is not being diverted and/or ponded at the wall location. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.6: Provide a detail for the wall with any wall openings noted along the northern property line that crosses the drainage easement to show that drainage is not being diverted or obstructed as required in the Drainage Statement. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 5-foot sidewalk and curb along the street frontage of Ganley Road. A continuous pedestrian circulation path must connect all public access areas of the proposed building and the circulation path located on Ganley Road. 5) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.12: Provide vehicular circulation clearly identified on the site plan. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2 for Vehicular Use Are design and circulation. a) Specifically provide a back-up spur at the end of the row of parking with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, a 3-foot radius, and a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced area. b) Otherwise provide a copy of the cross-access agreement or show surveyable easement in plan view, needed for access for 2 locations from the adjacent property to the west. Review of aerial photography shows that there are 2 driveways between the 2 lots, verification of the cross access agreement is needed. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension scuppers, that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk. Any scupper proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a revised Drainage Statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Provide dimensions for all easements of record graphically on the site plan together with recording docket and page references. Specifically provide the width of the existing TEP electrical easement that is shown on the grading plan and show graphically the drainage easement agreement in plan view on the site plan. 8) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.21: Provide dimensions from the street center-lines to the existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. 9) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles that are shown on the site plan. Provide a note on the site plan to state no structures and vegetation is allowed within 30" to 72" in height and will not be placed within the sight visibility triangles. Remove any proposed vegetation within the sight visibility triangle areas. 10) DS Sec.3-01.2.7 A: Revise detail A1 on Sheet A1.1 to clearly call out the 12:1 (H:V) or 1:12 (V:H) minimum slope requirement. Provide a separate detail showing a van accessible sign. Please refer to any Zoning comments for additional information. 11) DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 18' radii concrete headers or curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances along Ganley Road. The headers or curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan. 12) Tucson Code Sec.25-39: Revise site plan to show the maximum 2 driveways per 100 feet of street frontage. Currently the site plan shows 3 driveways along the street frontage road. Please refer to Traffic Engineering for additional information. GRADING PLAN: 13) Sheet C1.0 was not reviewed for grading plan requirements. A grading permit will be required for this project. 14) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Submit a copy of the grading plan with the grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent grading plan comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans 15) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.23: Provide the Bench Mark, based on the City of Tucson Datum, that was used to establish the existing topographic contours and spot elevations as shown on the grading plan. 16) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and Drainage Statement. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 17) Provide a general grading note-specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements) on the grading plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html Please provide a revised site plan, a revised landscape plan, and a revised Drainage Statement that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, landscape plan, and Drainage Statement. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/27/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See zoning review comments. |
| 06/27/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Vehicles may not back out onto public streets. The entrance drive directly to the south of the proposed warehouse addition does not provide for a turn around area. Demonstrate on the plan how vehicles will be able to turn around on site to exit this driveway. LUC 3.3.7.5 2) Detail the use of truncated domes rather than the linear tactile grooves in the handicap parking ramps. ANSI 3) A minimum 3-foot deep backup spur is required at the west end of the row of parking. An additional 3 feet is required behind the backup spur to allow for vehicle overhang where there is a wall, fence or other obstruction over six inches high adjacent to the row of parking. Label and dimension the required 3-foot backup spur and, if applicable the additional 3-foot overhang space. DS 3-05.2.2.D 4) Dimension the electric easements on the drawing. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 5) All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size for microfilming purposes. Revise any text, including that in the location map, which does not meet this minimum archiving standard. DS2-03.2.1.C 5) The sum of the proposed new building and canopy square footage total up to (14,156) which is less than the total sum of new building/canopy given (14,330) in the calculations. Revise. DS 2-02.2.2.A.2 6) Provide typical dimenions for the existing parking spaces, and the handicap spaces and aisle, located to the east of the building. Wheelstops are required in the spaces on the east side of this parking area to prevent vehicles from overhanging property lines. Show the required wheelstops dimensioned at 2-1/2 feet from the front of the existing parking spaces. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 DS 3-05.2.3.C 7) The established area street yard building setback requirement is the greater of 20 feet or 1-1/2 times the height of exterior structure wall. Revise site plan to demonstrate compliance. LUC 3.2.6.4 LUC 6.2.5 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2006 | ADRIANNE OLIVO | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/29/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |