Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T06CM02410
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/08/2006 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/12/2006 | DOUG LAAKSO | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | .. TO6CM02410 .. 6721 S. RENAISSANCE DRIVE .. TUCSON COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC .. DGL .. 1ST REVIEW .. 5/26/06 .. TRANSMIT PRIOR SUBMITTAL/S WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. S1. Provide completed Lot Combo Covenant for combining lots, see City of Tucson , DSD website : www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd for form to download. S2. Dimensionally locate the building from two adjacent property lines on site plan A-0.1. S3. Provide completed Code Review Checklist, including Allowable Area Calculation, ref T-1. S4. Clearly designate accessible route on site and floor plans, ref A-0.1 and A-1.0. S5. Provide address on building per Pima County Addressing Ordinance and IBC Section 501.2, 15 inches high minimum, visible from the street, ref west elevation on A-3.0. S6. Provide general notes on finishes ref drawing A-2.0 to show conformance with IBC Chapter 8,Section 803 Wall and Ceiling Finishes, Table 803.5, sprinklered, A-1 Group, exit access and rooms, for flame-spread and smoke-developed, ceilings, Section 804 Interior Floor Finish, Section 805 Decorations and Trim. S7. Provide notes on Drawing T-1 indicating the automatic fire sprinkler system is required per 2003 IBC Section 903.2.1.1,Item 2 and manual fire alarm is required per 2003 IBC Section 907.2.1. S8. Address on location map to be revised per Official Address Slip ref T-1. S9. Post Occupant Load in Auditorium and Multipurpose rooms per IBC Section 1004.3, show signs and locations it where they will be mounted on drawings. S10. Provide stairways and handrails conforming to IBC Section 1009, including complete architectural details ,structural details and calculations ref A-1.0. S11. Provide ramp plan and details in compliance with IBC Section 1010, A-0.1. S12. Provide Guards per IBC Section 1012 at floor areas greater than 30 inches above grade. S13. Provide Accessible Route per IBC Section 1104, designate on drawings. S14. Provide and show a minimum of four (4) accessible parking spaces (1-van accessible and 3- car accessible spaces) per IBC Section 1106 and ANSI A117.1-2003 ed on drawing A-0.1. S15. Provide receivers for assistive listening per IBC Section 1108.2.7, indicate on drawings. S16. Provide accessible route to performance area per IBC Section1108.2.8, ANSI A117.1 Section 6, show design on Structural and Architectural Drawings. S17. Provide fully complying toilet facilities per IBC Section 1109.2, ref drawing A-5.0 issues including: 1. Door at accessible stalls 2. Show minimum accessible stall width complies by dimensioning the stall clear width per ANSI A117.1-2003ed Section 604.8. 3. Fully dimension the required locations of all fixtures vertically and horizontally. 4. Location of flush controls. 5. Show compliance of lavatories, including clear space, knee and toe space, height, etc. 6. Show compliance of urinal, including clear space. 7. Horizontal dimension locating toilet paper holder. 8. Horizontal location of rear grab bar. 9. Remainder of items to be verified and shown on A-5.0. S18. Address accessibility at: 1. Snack bar per IBC Section 1109.4. 2. Drinking Fountain for Auditorium per IBC Section 1109.5. 3. Accessible controls per IBC Section 1109.13 S19. Provide Signage per IBC Section 1110. S20. Show ventilation for porches attic areas per IBC Section 1203. S21. Dimensionally locate roof mounted equipment from two adjacent walls, show equipment operating weights, coordinate with mechanical and structural designs, on roof plan A-7.0. S22. Verify/revise structural calculations wind factor appears to Iw = 1.15 and seismic factor Ie = 1.25 vs Iw = 1.0 and Ie = 1.0, per table 1604.5, based on occupant load of auditorium over 300. S23. Provide complete design data required per IBC Section 1603.1 S24. Provide revised structural calculation and detail ,using full live load for ledger L1 design sheet #7 of calculations, as area of ledger support is 4' X 25 ' = 100 SF. S25. Lettering size on detail sheets of Structural Drawings is below requirements of 1/8" minimum all capitals, revise Drawings S1.0, S3.0 and S4.0 to comply. S26. Provide copy of Soils Report and revise drawings to comply. S27. Provide Inspection Program required by the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code Section 302.5, by Architect or Engineer of Record, S28. Special Inspection required per 1997 UAC Section 306 for: 1. Soils. 2. Concrete. 3. Masonry. 4. Epoxy anchors. 5. Expansion anchors. S29. Submit two sets of shop drawings and calculations, stamped and signed by an Arizona Registered engineer, shop drawings shall be reviewed by and bear the approval of the Engineer or Architect of Record prior to submission to the City of Tucson , Development Services Department for approval prior to erection for : 1. Wood Trusses. 2. Wood I-Joists. 3. Wood Glu-Lams. S30. Separate Sign Permits required for signs. Questions? Call Douglas Laakso Structural Plans Examiner for the City of Tucson Development Services Department at (520) 791-5550 x1111, email at <Doug.Laakso@tucsonaz.gov.> or visit City of Tucson , DSD website : www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd. |
| 05/17/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide information to show how the outlet temperature of the hot water is to be limited to 110 degrees at the lavatories. Reference Section 804.3, IECC 2003. 2. The fixture connection sizes called out for the flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference Section A 6.1, UPC 2003 and IAPMO IS 3-2000, Section 610.0. 3. Coordinate the plumbing design with the utility design for the size of the reduced pressure backflow preventor. Reference Section 610.2, UPC 2003. 4. Resize the vent piping to conform to Table 7-5, UPC 2003, with no more than 24 fixture-units on a 2" vent line. Reference Section 703.2, UPC 2003 5. Provide the listing information for the 2-way cleanout fitting shown in Detail 4/P3.0. Reference Sections 707.4 and 707.6, UPC 2003. 6. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference Section 719.1, UPC 2003. 7. The scupper width is too small to accommodate the design rainfall. Reference Sections 1101.11.1 and 1101.11.2.4, UPC 2003. 8. Increase the size of the overflow in the roof drain collector box to equal the size of the scupper. Reference Section 1101.11.2.4, UPC 2003. |
| 05/18/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003. 2. Coordinate the design of the snack bar (#211) with regard to the user-supplied "gas range and oven" (detail 8/A-5.0). Reference Section 106.3.1, IMC 2003. |
| 05/18/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/26/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Southwest Tucson Community Church- Site Plan Review TO: Jay Hanson LOCATION: 6721 S Renaissance Dr., T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM02410 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan, landscape plan and drainage report. The drainage report was reviewed for site plan purpose only. The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3: Revise the drainage report to show the same watershed area for concentration points 1E (existing) and 1D (developed). Or explain the difference in watershed area used for the developed conditions. If concentration point 1D is 1.6 acres revise all of the calculations for hydrology and hydraulics and provide the correct storage volume required for the proposed basin. Revise the site plan to reflect any changes made in the drainage report. DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow from the roof drainage is contained under the sidewalk. Provide details in plan view for the scupper dimensions. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the existing sight visibility triangles, specifically at the south ingress/egress to show the required 20-foot stem side length. Refer to DS Sec3-01.5.1 for sight visibility triangle procedures and criteria. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles shown on the site plan. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide the required maneuvering area for any loading zone that is required and that is shown on the site plan. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Label 100-year water surface elevation and limits of ponding for the proposed detention basin in plan view to match the requirements of the drainage report. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension scuppers, that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk. Any scupper proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.17: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the site plan for grading plan purposes. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise Keynote #1 to include the Book and Page of Midvale Park Commerce Center DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide dimensions for refuse container as called out in Keynote #11, details could not be located on the Architectural Plans. Show and label gates or doors for trash enclosures. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. DS Sec.2-01.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles that are shown on the site plan. Provide a note on the landscape plan to state no structures and vegetation is allowed within 30" to 72" in height and will not be placed within the sight visibility triangles. Remove any proposed vegetation within the sight visibility triangle areas. DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances along Renaissance Drive. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan. DS Sec.3-01.3.3.B.5: Provide a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian circulation around the entire proposed structure, sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane (proposed location of loading zone) by means of curbing, grade separation, railing, or barriers. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.3 for pedestrian circulation paths. DS Sec. 3-05.2.1.C.3.a: Provide a minimum unobstructed radius of 18-feet for all PAAL intersections. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for all other vehicular use area design criteria. DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2: Provide a note on the site plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." DEVELOPMENT PLAN: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.29: Provide a development plan permit, per Plat Note #28 of Midvale Park Commerce Center, Book 36, Page 56, a development plan permit is required for all new development on each lot. Development Plan Sheets, 1-3, were not reviewed for development plan requirements. DS Sec.2-05: Refer to this section for development plan standards and requirements. Subsequent development plan comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. GRADING PLAN: DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the cut and fill quantities provided at resubmittal. If fill quantities exceed 50 cubic yards submit a copy of the grading plan with text upon completion and submittals of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf Revise the general construction note #5, to reference City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. GENERAL COMMENTS: Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. Please provide a revised site plan, a revised landscape plan, and a revised drainage report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, landscape plan, drainage report, and development plan reviews. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/26/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Southwest Tucson Community Church- Site Plan Review TO: Jay Hanson LOCATION: 6721 S Renaissance Dr., T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM02410 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan, landscape plan and drainage report. The drainage report was reviewed for site plan purpose only. The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DRAINAGE REPORT: DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3: Revise the drainage report to show the same watershed area for concentration points 1E (existing) and 1D (developed). Or explain the difference in watershed area used for the developed conditions. If concentration point 1D is 1.6 acres revise all of the calculations for hydrology and hydraulics and provide the correct storage volume required for the proposed basin. Revise the site plan to reflect any changes made in the drainage report. DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow from the roof drainage is contained under the sidewalk. Provide details in plan view for the scupper dimensions. SITE PLAN COMMENTS: DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the existing sight visibility triangles, specifically at the south ingress/egress to show the required 20-foot stem side length. Refer to DS Sec3-01.5.1 for sight visibility triangle procedures and criteria. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles shown on the site plan. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Provide the required maneuvering area for any loading zone that is required and that is shown on the site plan. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Label 100-year water surface elevation and limits of ponding for the proposed detention basin in plan view to match the requirements of the drainage report. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension scuppers, that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk. Any scupper proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a revised drainage report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.17: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the site plan for grading plan purposes. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Revise Keynote #1 to include the Book and Page of Midvale Park Commerce Center DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide dimensions for refuse container as called out in Keynote #11, details could not be located on the Architectural Plans. Show and label gates or doors for trash enclosures. The enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. DS Sec.2-01.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles that are shown on the site plan. Provide a note on the landscape plan to state no structures and vegetation is allowed within 30" to 72" in height and will not be placed within the sight visibility triangles. Remove any proposed vegetation within the sight visibility triangle areas. DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C: Depict and label 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances along Renaissance Drive. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan. DS Sec.3-01.3.3.B.5: Provide a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian circulation around the entire proposed structure, sidewalks must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane (proposed location of loading zone) by means of curbing, grade separation, railing, or barriers. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.3 for pedestrian circulation paths. DS Sec. 3-05.2.1.C.3.a: Provide a minimum unobstructed radius of 18-feet for all PAAL intersections. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for all other vehicular use area design criteria. DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2: Provide a note on the site plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." GRADING PLAN: DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the cut and fill quantities provided at resubmittal. If fill quantities exceed 50 cubic yards submit a copy of the grading plan with text upon completion and submittals of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf Revise the general construction note #5, to reference City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for basin, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to basin. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. GENERAL COMMENTS: Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. Please provide a revised site plan, a revised landscape plan, and a revised drainage report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan, landscape plan, drainage report, and geotechnical report reviews. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/02/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning acknowledges the building heights are appropriate for this zoning classification. Further review of the building plans can be done once the site plan has been approved for this project. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |