Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM02391
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Gate need Fire Dept. lock box. |
| 06/28/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
| 06/28/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 1, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM02391 PROJECT NAME: Tucson: New Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 1375 West Glenn Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT Please note another reviewer than the first conducted this review. 1. Indicate that all ramps located within the ROW will have detectable warnings (truncated domes). 2. Provide existing and future sight visibility triangles for all entrance/exit drives to Glenn Street and Flowing Wells Road. Refer to Development Standard 3-01.5.0. for the requirements. DS 2-02.2.1.A10. 3. Once calculated provide in a general note the water surface elevation, the required finish floor elevation (FFE) and the datum. DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. The above comment is from the first review. Given that a floodplain analysis was not conducted the reference water surface elevation could change. Revise general note14 to reflect the water surface elevation for the City of Tucson floodplain. See drainage report comments for additional comments. 4. Dimension from street centerline the existing ROW width for Glenn Street and Flowing Wells Road. If the dimension is the same provide only one dimension and label the dimension accordingly. Provide this information on sheet C-501. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 12 5. Provide the existing pavement width for Glenn Street and Flowing Wells Road. If the dimension is the same provide only one dimension and label the dimension accordingly. Provide this information on sheet C-501. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21. 13 6. The future ROW information provided on the plan is not correct. Please see redlines. From centerline provide the future ROW width, future curb and sidewalk location for Glenn Street and Flowing Wells Road. Again, if the widths are the same show only one dimension. The width of the sidewalk area for a 76' ROW width is 9'. Provide the requested information with appropriate labels. Provide this information on sheet C-501. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19. 14 7. Provide the datum for the shown contours. This datum should also be the same datum used for the WSE and the FFE, otherwise a conversion will need to be provided on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23. The above comment is from the first review and has not been fully addressed. It is acknowledged that the basis of elevation has been provided however the datum, NAVD 1988 or NGVD 1929, must be noted with the basis of elevation. Revise the plan to show datum in general note 15. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. Per SMDDRM, 2.3.1.6.C., a very detailed Detention/Retention Basin Maintenance Checklist and Schedule shall be provided by an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer, which will be followed by anyone performing scheduled and unscheduled maintenance on behalf of the owner(s). A maintenance checklist and schedule shall be provided in the drainage report in effort to clearly communicate the responsibilities involved by the owner for proper maintenance of retention basins. Include a detailed retention basin maintenance checklist and schedule in the drainage report. The above comment is from the previous review and has not fully been addressed. The drainage report must outline the long-term basin maintenance responsibility for this development rest with the owner of this facility. It must be clear in the report include the name, address and telephone number of the person responsible for the long-term basin maintenance. However, the City of Tucson reserves the right to periodically inspect or review any private-maintenance actions that would help to ensure that private maintenance, related to facility operation and safety, is being adequately provided. The owner is also responsible for providing once a year to the City of Tucson Development Service Department, Engineering Division a certified inspection report by an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer stating either no maintenance work is needed at that time or a list of repairs and work to be done to correct the deficiencies to the drainage facilities. The maintenance checklist does not specifically indicate how the preliminary collection systems (basin/water harvesting area) will be maintained. It is recommended to use a more detailed detention/retention checklist. See the submitted document, "Maintenance Checklist for Detention/Retention Requirements." This document can be utilized or verbiage can be pulled to create a more detailed checklist. 2. Provide on the pre and post development site plans all points of drainage concentration for a 100 year event. Be advised this information will also need to be on the site plan. Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management 2.3.1.3.A and B 2.b. 3. This project is not a mapped FEMA floodplain but the parcel lies within a City of Tucson (COT) Regulatory Flood Hazard Area. Areas with a 100-year discharge of 100 cfs or more are designated as a City of Tucson Regulatory Flood Hazard Area. The City of Tucson Floodplain Ordinance requires all structures located within a designated flood hazard area (FEMA or COT) is required to elevate one foot above the 100-year water surface elevation (WSE). Provide a floodplain analysis for the existing and future floodplain conditions for the proposed development. In the analysis provide the WSE for the 100 year event, the FFE and the datum. Refer to the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management 2.3.1.4., for additional report format, content and requirements. 4. The 10-year flow must be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all down spout locations. Provide calculations, scupper details and discussion stating that the 10-year flow will be contained under the pedestrian circulation at all concentrated locations with. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16. |
| 06/28/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T06CM02391 1375 W. Glenn St. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/28/07 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The following comments have not been completely addressed DS 2-20.2.1.8 Per DS 3-05.2.3.C Wheel stops or barriers must be provided at any parking spaces or vehicular use areas to prevent extending beyond property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and to prevent from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Curbing will be required at the southwest corner of the property near the west property line. Wheel stops are required at the three parking spaces located at the north west corner of the new structure or provide a sidewalk with a minimum 6'-6" width. (minimum 4' wide sidewalk required in front of the overhang portion of the vehicle) 2. The following comments have not been completely addressed DS 2-02.2.1.10 Indicate future sight visibility triangles at all vehicular entrances to the property. See engineering comments. 3. The following comments have not been completely addressed DS 2-02.2.1.12 Vehicular, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified. See DS 2-08 for criteria regarding pedestrian access. Clearly indicate by dimension the widths of all sidewalks. Landings are required at the top of each handicap ramp. If the landing area is within a pedestrian circulation path the minimum depth of 4' is required. Landings are missing at the handicap ramp at the main entrance to the proposed structure, at the handicap ramp at the west end of the crosswalk between the two structures Provide a detail of the handicap ramp. Provide cross reference information on the site plan for location of the detail. 4. The following comments have not been completely addressed DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide existing and proposed site lighting layout and type. Per your response that the site lighting is shown on C-501. Provide a detail of the proposed lighting pole structures. Clearly indicate the height of the fixture above grade. 5. The following comments have not been completely addressed DS 2-02.2.1.31 List as the existing and proposed use as: "Trade Service and Repair - Major DD "34" : subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.15" Add the subject to: section to the use. 6. The landscape plan does not match the site plan. Landscaping appears to be located in places where pedestrian circulation is required, other areas also do not match. Revise landscape plan to match the site plan. 7. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\DSC\T06CM02391-3.doc |
| 07/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. |
| 07/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise landscape plan per DS 2-07.0. to verify that entire site meets current minimum requirements. Indicate all improvements. This includes existing area. 2. Fifty (50) percent or more of all street landscape borders must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 4. Show on the site plan existing and future sight visibility triangles DS 2-02.2.2.1.A.10 5. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Verify entire site meets canopy tree requirement. 6. Submit Application for Exception; include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. 7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape & grading plan. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/16/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |