Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T06CM02342
Parcel: 12212246B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - T06CM02342
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2007 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
01/03/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 4315, 4317, 4319 & 4321 E. Fairmount St. Duplexes
T06CM02342
Site Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. It appears that this project is comprised of two (2) different parcels. Prior to approval of the site plan the parcels will need to be combined. Provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. This recordation is done at the Pima County Recorders Office.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 Remove the address from the legal description and revise the legal description to read "SPEEDWAY ADDITION LOT 4 BLOCK 12.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 Provide the size and height of all existing buildings on site.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The 10' foot setback called out along the east property scales out at 7'-0". The existing building setbacks along the east property line scale out to 9'. The last approved site plan found in The City of Tucson records shows a 12' setback along the east property line to the buildings. Per the LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 the required setback would be 10 or ¾ the height of the building wall. Based on the LUC the minimum setback should be 10'. Clarify what the setback is.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Remove the reference to RY Setback 15' located along the north property line from the plan. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.4 the required setback would be 10 or ¾ the height of the building wall, which ever is greatest.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Remove the reference to FY Setback 15' located along the south property line from the plan. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A the required setback would be 20' or 1 ½ the height of the building wall, which ever is greatest.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Per the last approved site plan it appears that there is enough paving to accommodate the required parking. It appears that new curbing is proposed through out the site, clarify. Clearly delineate what is existing pavement and what is proposed.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Remove the proposed one way PAAL from the north end of the parking to N. Columbus Lane. This connection will not be required based on the last approved plan.

10. D.S. 2-02.A.2.1.10 Provide existing & future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan.

11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide the existing and future right-of-way dimensions for Fairmount Street.

12. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.1 Provide the gross lot area. The area shown on the plan only reflects parcel 12212246A and should include parcel 12212246A for at total of 36,030 sq. ft.

13. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.2 Provide the floor area for all buildings on the site.

14. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Provide a lot coverage calculation which includes both parcels and all structures on site.

15. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 Based on LUC Sec. 3.2.3.1C provide a density calculation on the plan. Density allowed 12 units, Density provided 6 units.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\site\t06cm02342.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
01/04/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Passed
01/04/2007 SSHIELD1 ADA REVIEW Passed
01/09/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Submit documents related to the non-conforming status of the parcel. Submit any previously approved plans with the date of the last zoning compliance review. LUC 3.7.1.2
01/09/2007 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Denied Submit a native plant preservation plan or Application for Exception. See DS 2-15 for additional information. LUC 3.8
01/11/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: January 18, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM02342
PROJECT ADDRESS: 4315-4321 East Fairmount Street
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate

The following items must be revised or added to the site plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: SITE PLAN

1. Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4.

2. Revise the legend to provide the line weights shown on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.

3. Provide bearings for the lot dimensions. DS 2-02.2.1.A.5.

4. Provide existing sight visibility triangles (SVT). For a drive to a local street the near side length is 185' and the far side length is 110'. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10.

5. Clarify the hand written one way access through the property. Is this what is being proposed? DS 2-02.2.1.A.11.

6. Provide existing drainage patterns on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

7. Show the direction of drainage on each roof. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16.

8. Include on the site plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17.

9. Indicate if Fairmount Street is private or public and provide recordation data (book and page). DS 2-02.2.1.A.18.

10. All easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan with recordation data (book and page). DS 2-02.2.1.A.20.

11. Dimension from the street centerline of Fairmount Street the existing ROW, curb and sidewalk location. DS 2-02.2.1.A.21.

12. Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2' and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, include the book and page. DS 2-02.2.1.A.23.

13. Vertical curb is shown in several areas on the plan and it is not clear if the curb is proposed or existing. Please clarify. Additional comments could apply with this comment.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/22/2007 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/22/2007 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed