Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T06CM02285
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL

Permit Number - T06CM02285
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/30/2007 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. (Variance Comment).

2. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. (Variance comment).

3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. Verify entire street landscape border meets requirement. Boldly delineate existing trees.

4. Trees that are located in areas of required landscaping will be a minimum 15 gallon container size per DS 2-06.3.5.C. Revise size on planting plan

5. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4. (See following comment).

6. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. the screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. The use of vegetation to satisfy the screen requirement is allowed only to provide for alternative treatment and is not in any way meant to imply that the vegetative screen can also be used to meet the landscape requirement.

7. Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. Specify which species of Leucophyllum will be used, some varieties will exceed of 30"

8. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Entire vehicle use area does not meet requirement.

9. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed.

10. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting.

11. Additional comments may apply.
01/30/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
01/31/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied Please see zoning review comments.
01/31/2007 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: T06CM00365
301 E. Fort Lowell Road
Lot combination more than 25%, new parking lot more than 25%
Site plan, 3rd review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 30, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, stating how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. (Per last review) Per DS 2-02.2.1.8/DS 3-05, regarding parking/future ROW taking:
A) A MSR covenant is required to ensure site is in code compliance with road widening.
RESPONSE: requests a variance to recordation of this covenant. This covenant must be recorded. Provide copy and recordation receipt on next review.

2) (Per this review) Per DS 2-02.2.1.8, Per ANSI, IBC, regards to handicapped parking:
A) Provide two handicapped parking spaces. (This review, move it closer to entrance)
RESPONSE: Please move the handicapped spaces on the future site plan closer to the building entrance and show the building entrance on the building footprint.
B) Provide note for $518.00 fine for illegal parking in a handicapped space.
RESPONSE: I see it, thank you. Please enlarge type to 12 point - for microfilming

3. Per DS 2-02.2.1.12, for pedestrian, handicapped, vehicular/bicycle circulation:
A) (last review) provide truncated domes where needed. RESPONSE: I see detail, thank you. Provide truncated domes where I marked in purple..
B) (this review) is there a handicapped ramp missing from the current and future site plan - in the area of the sidewalk that meets the handicapped access aisle?

C) (last review) provide circulation info on both future and current plans
RESPONSE: I see the handicapped parking space relocated to the new parking lot. Please relocate it closer to the entrance of the building, the proximity is too far.
RESPONSE: Can future handicapped parking be relocated closer to building entry?

4. Depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions, contact me at heather.thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-791-4541x1156. I can meet you at the counter to see changes - contact me first to set up a time please.

HCT C:\planning\site\DSD\T06CM02285 301 e fort lowell new plan 3.doc
02/02/2007 SUZANNE BOHNET ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The Drainage Statement provided with the re-submittal did not discuss improved water harvesting techniques or the 5-year threshold retention volume calculation or basin design. Please provide these details for Site Plan approval.

Thank you,
Suzanne Bohnet, CFM
(520) 791-5550 x1188
Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/27/2007 DELMA ROBEY APPROVAL SHELF Completed
02/27/2007 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/27/2007 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed