Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM02154
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/21/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders are required for both lots, a street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. 2. "Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets" per LUC 3.7.2.4.3. Provide approval documentation for landscaping within ROW along 4th. Ave. 3. Additional comments may apply |
| 04/24/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | Exception |
| 05/12/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 12, 2006 SUBJECT: Proposed Coffee Shop- Site Plan Review TO: Steve Gregor LOCATION: 249 E 25th Street, T14S R13E Sec24, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green and Elizabeth Eberbach, P.E. ACTIVITY: T06CM02154 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan and Hydrology Report. The Hydrology Report was reviewed for site plan purpose only. The site plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: DS Sec.6-01.2.1.B.1: Alley service will be provided only where the alleys are constructed with a 20 foot wide cross section and maintained for clear access. Clarify on the site plan, Key Note # 6, if the refuse containers are to be rolled out to the curb or provide a letter from John Clark at 791-5543 x1136 for approval of refuse enclosure location stating that the alley will be serviced. Provide dimensions for refuse container area. Refer to DS Sec. 6-01.2.1.B.1.a-c for the required standards. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.15: Show and accurately label the water surface contours with the respective cross-sections for the 100-year floodplain that were provided within the Hydrology Report. Provide the symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals shown on the site plan in the Legend. Chapter 26 Section 26.11, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management requirements: (a) Except as otherwise provided in these regulations, it shall be unlawful for any person to establish, erect, alter or relocate a use or structure in the regulatory floodplain or an erosion-prone area as described in section 26-11.1(2) without first obtaining a floodplain use permit from the city engineer, (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to perform any grading operation in or alteration of any watercourse in violation of this chapter. Without written authorization from the city engineer, any such act, including excavation of any kind, is a public nuisance per se and may be abated, prevented or restrained by action of the city. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan at re-submittal. The revised site plan must address the comments provided above. Due to the comments generated the site plan may be submitted to me for over the counter review and approval, as long as all of the items have been addressed. Submit a Floodplain Use permit for review and approval with the grading plan submittal. Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Site Plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/04/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/04/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The parking calculations indicate that three (3) vehicle spaces are required and provided for the existing residence but these spaces are not shown on the plan. Revise to show all vehicle parking as required and label clearly that the three additional required spaces are for the residence only and not for the coffee shop. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 2) A minimum of two bike parking spaces are required per LUC 3.3.3.5. Revise the calculation for bicycle parking required accordingly. DS 2-02.2.2.A.4 3) List the restrictions that the proposed restaurant use is subject to. In the C-1 zone, the food service use is subject to LUC 3.5.4.6.A and .C. 4) Provide a copy of the last approved site plan from records. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2006 | ADRIANNE OLIVO | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/06/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |