Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL NEW
Permit Number - T06CM01891
Review Name: COMMERCIAL NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/13/2006 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1.provide the service lateral conductors.2.provide the available fault current. 3.indicate arc fault protected circuits for all bedroom circuits.(your comment on arc fault receptacles is not enough this requirement is required on all the loads served in the bedrooms).4.provide the A.I.C. rating of all the panels and service equipment. |
| 04/24/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/04/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Permits will be approved when the Site Plan and Grading Plan have been approved. If you have any questions you may contact me at 791-5640 ext.1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/08/2006 | RAUL PALMA | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) All units and grade level shall be (B) type units and be accessible. See ANSI requirements section 1004. 2) Sheet S3.0 is shown a shearwall schedule, where is the octagonal marks on plans? As specified on the schedule. |
| 05/09/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/10/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sign and seal the Compliance Statement for the energy conservation code calculations. Reference Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304. 2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 3. Provide a trap for the secondary condensate drain (fan coil unit detail, sheet MP1.1). Reference Section 304.1, IMC 2003. 4. Coordinate the location of the access panels for the fan coil units with the waste and vent piping. 5. Each fan coil is scheduled to provide 45 CFM to each unit; how is the 45 CFM being supplied to the fan coil? Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. |
| 05/10/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 2. Clarify the first floor elevation of the apartment building; sheet C1.0 shows it as 100 feet above the grade elevation noted on the site survey. 3. Provide shower and tub/shower control valves that comply with the requirements of Section 420.0, UPC 2003. 4. Coordinate the design of the first and second floor waste and vent piping for all of the units. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 5. Show how the 4" waste piping is to be installed in the cores of the 6" CMU walls. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 6. Provide waste and vent isometrics for units 1-6 that shows the complete waste and vent system for a unit (i.e. both floors and all fixtures). Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 7. Provide a waste and vent isometric for units 7 and 8 to clarify how the waste from P-5 is connected to the building drain and how the vents are routed. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 8. All storage-type water heaters installed in closed systems require a listed expansion tank. Please show expansion tanks on plans. Reference Section 608.3, UPC 2003 with local amendments. 9. Provide the listing information for the proposed reduced pressure backflow preventer. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. |
| 05/20/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/20/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time until the plans have been completely approved through the commercial review process. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the CDRC approved tentative plat/development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plan packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The tentative plat/development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. 3. Zoning will re-review and approve the building plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package and the building structural portions of the plan review have been approved. See comment 2 for additional info regarding the site plan process. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2006 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/15/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |