Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PLANS OK TO SUBMIT - RES
Permit Number - T06CM01866
Review Name: PLANS OK TO SUBMIT - RES
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T06CM01866 515 S. Convent Avenue New SFR - LDO comments TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 1, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Site plan information is not complete. The following comments have been made due to deficiencies and other criteria that must be met or approved through a DDO and HPZ process. 2. The building setbacks have not been met along street frontage, portions of the south boundary, along the north boundary, and the east boundary of the property. a. The minimum building setback along the street frontage is based on the greatest of 20 feet or one and one half the height of the structure. Per the plan the structure (residence portion) is to be built at zero lot line along the street property line. b. Per the plan the plan the garage structure is to be built along the street frontage but not completely parallel to the property line but approximately 6 inches to 1.5 feet from the property line. Per LUC section 3.2.6.5.B.2, the garage setback must be a minimum of 18 feet from the property line. This setback must be approved through a board of adjustment variance process. c. Along the north property boundary the building setback must be based on the height of the structure. The proposed building setbacks along the north boundary vary from .97 feet to 7 feet. Based on the shortest and tallest building height for the north elevation, the minimum setback requirements are 14 feet to 22 feet 5 inches. d. Along the south boundary the building setbacks must be based on the height of the building. The building height for the south elevation of the garage is 14 feet 9 inches and building height for two story portion of the structure along the same south property line is 20 feet 10 inches. e. Along the east boundary of the property the building setback must be based on the height of the structure. The building height for the east elevation was not clearly dimensioned but scales approximately from 9 feet to 12 feet. Minimum building setback required is 12 feet. f. The owner proposes to construct a 1.5-foot masonry retaining wall with a 9-foot tall corrugated tin fence on top. The proposed fence height with retaining wall equals ten and one-half feet in height. The overall height of the retaining wall and fence requires approval through a board of adjustment DDO or the fence with retaining wall must be lowered not to exceed ten feet total. 3. It is not clear if the lot coverage is accurate because the lot coverage calculation is not complete per our standards. Lot coverage includes the residence, all enclosed structures such as sheds and vehicular use areas. The calculation must be revised to include the information as listed above. Revise and list the square footage of the ground floor for the residence and the vehicular use area as redlined on the plan. 4. The lot size does not meet the minimum lot size requirement for a single family home. The minimum is lot size is 5,000 square feet and the square footage listed on the plan is 4,400 square feet. The lot is made up of portions of parcels. The original platted lot has been chopped upped into several lots and the dates of splits and lot reconfigurations must be verified prior to submittal to any process for a DDO or HPZ. In addition, nonconforming status must be granted by the Zoning Administrator for the lot size. Please contact Bill Balak at 791-4541 ext. 1168 for more information on this requirement. 5. Please revise the plan accordingly and resubmit for re-review prior to submittal for DDO review. This review has been made to ensure that the plan is in compliance with requirements for the proposed use and development criteria as well as site plan drawing and information requirements. 6. The proposed building includes windows and possibly doors that may not meet the fire code requirements. Some of the windows are at zero lot line and one of the doors on the north side does not appear to meet the fire setback. It is recommended that the applicant see the residential reviewer to ensure that the items listed in this comment meet building code or are addressed prior to re-submittal of the plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T06CM01866DDOcomments.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 06/28/2007 | CAGUILA1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 06/28/2007 | CAGUILA1 | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |