Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM01769
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Fire hydrant required per C.O.T. amendment to the IFC 2003, Section 508.5.2 2) No Parking, Fire Lane signs required. Indicate location on plan. 3) Indicate which units are in which buildings |
| 04/10/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | exception |
| 04/10/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | "Where a landscape border or other landscape area abuts the vehicular use area, canopy trees within those landscape areas may count toward the vehicular use area canopy tree requirement, provided: The trees are planted within 10 feet of the vehicular use area" per DS 2-06.3.3.A.1. Revise plans to provide additional trees for vehicle use area. |
| 04/25/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Integrated Design & Construction DATE: April 26, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet Engineering Division SUBJECT: 3331 E. Bermuda St. 2 New Duplex, 2 New Triplex Site plan T06CM01769 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 33 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP with your next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please clarify the amounts of estimated cut and fill. The estimates listed on the SP do not agree with those listed on the Grading Plan Sheet G1. 2. Please clarify if the monument line is the basis of bearing. If so, please provide the bearing. 3. The sidewalk handicap ramps with truncated domes refer to "DS 207". DS is a Development Standard and number 207 refers to landscaping. It is assumed you meant to refer to the Standard Detail # 207. Please correct the reference to the following: "PC/COT Std. Dtl. 207" or "PC/COT SD 207". (Note: "PC" stands for Pima County; "COT" stands for City of Tucson.) 4. Please call out the vertical curb separating the onsite sidewalk from the Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL). Additional Notes: 1. The amount of fill called out on the SP requires a Grading Permit. Due to the size of the lot and the amount of fill, there is no need to prepare and submit either a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan or a Soils Report. 2. Please provide a Drainage Statement sealed by an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer that supports the drainage flow proposed on the Grading Plan to ensure there are no adverse effects to adjacent properties and to ensure similar drainage patterns will be maintained post-development. 3. The Drainage Statement should also address Water Harvesting on the lot. Please refer to the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual, available in PDF format on the Dept. of Transportation Website. Manuals are also available at the Counter on the 1st Floor Engineering Section. Please call the City of Tucson Stormwater Management Section at (520) 791-4251 if you have any questions. 4. Please clarify the purpose of the 6" swale as shown on Detail 4/C2. If it is to be used for Water Harvesting purposed, please add that note to the SP. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Suzanne Bohnet, Engineer Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/15/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/15/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide copies of the other sheets listed under schedule of drawings, such as elevations, floor plans, details, etc. Elevation drawings are necessary to verify compliance with required building setbacks. Based on the Site Data given under "Building Height", perimeter yard building setbacks are not met. With adjacent R-2 zoning the required side and rear perimeter yard bldg. setback for development designator "K" is the greater of 10 feet and 3/4 height of exterior structure wall. The required street perimeter yard setback is the greater of 20 feet and 1-1/2 times the height of exterior building wall. Submit elevation drawings and revise plan and site data to demonstrate how building setbacks are met. LUC 3.2.6.4 LUC 3.2.6.5 DS 2-02.2.1.A.7 2) The location of the bicycle parking on the plan drawing is slightly different from what is shown in the detail. Revise for consistency. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/31/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |