Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T06CM01513
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2007 | WILDAN | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | May 17, 2007 City of Tucson Development Services P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726 RE: HAJIRA HOUSE – 2nd REVIEW CITY OF TUCSON LOG NO. T06CM01513 WILLDAN PROJECT NO. 13881-7009 The second review for the above project has been completed. This letter contains comments which need to be addressed by written responses to each which indicate any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter second review, all corrections and revisions must be made on the original plans and two complete new sets of prints, along with one complete redlined set, must be returned to our office. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets, and that all changes have been highlighted with appropriate revision numbers, revision dates, and “cloud bubbles.” Pen or pencil corrections on final prints are not acceptable. This project has been reviewed for conformance with the 2003 IRC, 2003 IBC, 2003 IECC, 1997 UAC, 2002 NEC (with local modifications) and the 2003 UPC. Any revisions to this plan will require an additional review and approval by Willdan. Should you have questions regarding the comments herein, please contact your plans examiners Chris Kiel, Occupancy Occup. Load Construction Area S.F. Sprinklered Alarms R-3 N/A V-B 1472 N/A Smoke Special Inspection is required for the following items: Field Welding The following items are acceptable for deferred submittals: Pre-Fabricated Roof Dome GENERAL COMMENTS: General A signed special inspection form from the City of Tucson is required at the time that the plans are resubmitted for a back check. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Policy. ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: Sheet A.2 By definition, a room that has a closet (Room #101 and #107) is considered a bedroom and must meet all the requirements of a bedroom, such as light, ventilation, electrical, egress, etc. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Requirements. Comment Remains: Room 101 should be renamed Library/Bedroom. Reference Section 106.1.1 of the 2003 IRC. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: General Please provide complete general structural notes describing all codes, soils bearing values, building materials used, construction notes, required special inspections, submittals to be deferred, etc. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Comment Remains: Please include all special inspections in the general structural notes and describe the responsibilities of the inspecting parties per chapter 17 of the 2003 IBC. Sheet S.2 Provide complete detailing of all roof connections at both the exterior utility closet pop-out and the rounded pop-out off the great room. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Comment Remains: It appears that no new details were added at these areas. Provide complete detailing of all framing and connections at both domes. Currently, the only information is shown on the architectural sections. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Comment Remains: Please include all framing details for the tall turret from the base to the top. Detail 5/S.4 cut over the kitchen does not appear to be applicable here. It appears that this should have been 4/S.4. Please clarify. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Comment Remains: Show how B-4 is connected to B-4. Please provide complete detailing of the roof framing over both entranceways. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Comment Remains: Please provide a complete lateral load path from the high roof to the low roof sheathing. Please show how the ridge is supported in this detail. Please clarify the framing around the steel tower support. The architectural section suggests there is a roof pop-up here; however, this is not indicated on the roof-framing plan. Reference IBC Section 106.1.1. Comment Remains: Please show all roof framing members that bear on this steel framing and a detailed section of the steel framing showing the relation to the roof and adjoining members and any required lateral ties. Sheet S.4 Detail 3: Please revise ledger connection and provide complete calculations for the ledger design. The wood ledger must either make complete contact with the concrete or be supported by proper means. It is not permissible to span the anchor bolts through the foam. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. Comment Remains: Please provide calculation for the design of the wood ledger. Detail 6: Please provide calculation and design for the in-wall columns below this detail with loads up to 15k and include all applicable lateral/gravity load cases. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. Comment Not Addressed. CALCULATIONS Sheet 10: Please revise this model to more accurately represent the actual framing conditions and include all load derivations. Also, clarify all input values. Reference IBC Section 1604.4. Comment Remains: It is noted that the lateral loading is conservative; however, the simplified 2D model does not accurately represent the actual framing. The columns are not placed in a rectangular symmetric pattern and the dead loads of the frame do not appear to be accounted for. Also, the reaction at the roof is noted to be over 7000 lbs per computer output and there are no ties that positively attach this to the roof diaphragm to provide the fixed horizontal restraint that the calculations assume. Please address in both orthogonal directions. Provide calculation for diaphragm shears, required nailing, tension chords and indication of what framing members act as the diaphragm chords. Also, include notched diaphragm design and force transfer around openings in the roof diaphragm. Reference IBC Sections 1603.1 and 1604.4, and ASCE-7 9.5.2.6. Comment Remains: Please provide complete analysis of the diaphragm shears and strut forces around the opening in the roof at the great room area. The basic diaphragm analysis provided does not apply here. Reference ASCE-7 02 9.5.2.6.2.7 and IBC 2305.1.2 PLUMBING COMMENTS: Sheet P.1 Show the size of waste lines, vents, and required clean-outs. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Requirements. Reference 2003 UPC Section 707.4. Exception is #1. Comment Remains: Not addressed. Note that bathtub and shower enclosures shall be finished with ceramic tile, or an approved nonabsorbent surface, to a height of 72” above the drain. Reference IRC Section R307.2 and UPC Sections 412.7 and 412.8. Comment Remains: Not addressed. Please provide the trap and vent at the shower in Room #108. Reference 2003 UPC Section 901.0 without an Isometric. Unable to clarify. Comment Remains: Not addressed. Sheet S.2 Roof drains for the materials used within a building (reference 2003 UPC Section 1101.3) and secondary roof drains (reference 2003 UPC Section 1101.11.2.1.) Comment Remains: Not addressed. MECHANICAL COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: Sheet E-1 Please provide cut sheets for all the exterior light fixtures shown or noted. The cut sheets need to provide lumens per fixture and show if the fixture is a full cut-off, which means no light is emitted at or above the horizontal plane. Please provide cut sheets and calculations for all exterior lighting fixtures. Reference the of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. Comment Remains: Please provide the lighting area in which the house is to be built (eg. E3, E3a, E2 etc.). Cross-reference exterior lighting fixtures on the plans with the cut sheets and calculations submitted. Reference the City of Tucson Submittal Requirements. Comment Remains: Please provide full information on the schedule with the total lumen output and lot area. ENERGY CODE COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS: Reviewed and accepted. Sincerely, WILLDAN Chris Kiel, C.B.O., M.C.P. Building Official CEK/jk |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/05/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |