Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW
Permit Number - T06CM01121
Review Name: POST 3RD PARTY REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/17/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/17/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide complete sprinkler design criteria on plans, including: a) Identification of hazard classification, including any special hazards. b) The standard to be used for the construction detail. c) The availability and adequacy of the water supply. d) The determination of the design density and area of operations. |
| 04/19/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEEDS WASTEWATER 8TH FLOOR REVIEW: WHERE IS THE EXISTING BUILDING @225 W VALENCIA RD CONNECTED TO SEWER-WILL THE FUTURE EAST BUILDING PAD BE ON THE SAME PROPERTY OR WILL A JT SEWER USE AGREEMENT BE REQUIRED |
| 04/24/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: April 24, 2006 SUBJECT: New Furniture Store- Site Plan Review TO: Ben Rios LOCATION: 229 E Valencia Road, T154S R13E Sec12, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green and Elizabeth Eberbach, P.E. ACTIVITY: T06CM01121 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted site plan. The site plan is not approved until the resubmittal and approval of Development Plan, D05-0040. The following comments related to the Development Plan review dated March 8, 2006 prepared by Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate must be addressed prior to approval of the Site Plan: Development Plan: 1) The requested DSMR for the detention basin design has been denied and a multi-use design must be provided for the basin as discussed in the engineering response to the DSMR request. 2) Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Obtain permission from John Clark at 791-5543 x1136 for approval of refuse enclosure location. Specifically the enclosure must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between steel pipes that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewalls. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Drainage Report: 3) This Drainage Report has been accepted for Development Plan purposes only. Additional comments may be necessary at the grading plan stage. Please provide a revised Site Plan, Development Plan and Drainage Report at re-submittal. The revised Site Plan, Development Plan and Drainage Report must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/13/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/13/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time until the plans have been completely approved through the commercial review process. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the CDRC approved tentative plat/development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plan packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The tentative plat/development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. 3. Zoning will re-review and approve the building plans on the next submittal providing the stamped and approved site plans are included with the building plan package and the building structural portions of the plan review have been approved. See comment 2 for additional info regarding the site plan process. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2006 | AMERY KLAPPERT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/22/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |