Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T06CM00805
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2006 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/27/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The landscape plan must include the following grading information per DS 2-07.2.2.B: · Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope or slope ratio. · Material and areas of inert ground cover such as rip rap or other stabilization materials · Detail how required landscape will be placed within basins. 2. Verify calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. It appears that street landscape borders may have less than 50% coverage. 3. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for recreational use area (pool) must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The height of screening material is measured on the project side of the screen, at finish grade. Revise screen location or detail how requirement will be met. 4. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of 34 square feet in area and 4 feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. The measurement is always within the planter area and does not include any material which defines the outer edge of the unpaved area per DS 2-06.3.3.C. Include inside dimensions of all planters on the landscape and site plans. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/28/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/25/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Peter Salonga DATE: July 26, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 375 W. Blacklidge Dr. Oracle 21 Homes Site plan T06CM00805 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP with your next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Oracle Rd. is a Major Street & Route with a future right-of-way (ROW) width of 150 feet. The SP shows a future ROW width on Oracle Rd. of 60 feet. Please check with the Department of Transportation (TDOT) for the details of the future ROW on Oracle Rd. and add those dimensions to the SP. 2. Please clarify what the "FUTURE ROW" label on parcel A is referencing. 3. Please check with the TDOT for information and details regarding the possible widening of the intersection at Oracle Rd. and Miracle Mile and note on the SP. 4. The stem on the sight visibility triangles (SVT) is 20 feet long. Please correct all the SVTs on the SP. 5. An SVT is required for the northeast corner of the property at the intersection of Balboa and Blacklidge. This may impact the location of the proposed 6-foot block wall on the property perimeter. 6. Please provide the existing and future SVT for the Oracle/Blacklidge intersection. 7. The dimensions given in the Blacklidge ROW is unclear. Clearly identify what the dimensions are measuring. For example, label the line representing the existing and/or proposed curb, the existing and/or proposed sidewalk, etc. 8. Please call out the width of the ROW sidewalks and the space between the curb and sidewalk. 9. The detail for the refuse container enclosure is not accepted. Please review the attached detail for the requirements of the enclosure and modify the detail appropriately. 10. There are multiple FFEs listed on the apartments. Please clarify. Grading Permit: A Drainage Report is required with the submittal of the Grading Permit and Grading Plan. Please ensure the Drainage Report discusses how the detention/retention basins were designed with appropriate supporting analysis. The Drainage Report needs to also discuss any water harvesting techniques. Water harvesting is a requirement per the City of Tucson Code, Chapter 23 (the Land Use Code), Section 3.7.1.1.A. In the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual Appendix A, there is a discussion on how water harvesting can reduce the amount of retention required. The Guidance Manual is available on line or can be picked up at the Engineering counter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Suzanne Bohnet, CFM, Engineer Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/25/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Lead Planner Principal Planner PROJECT:T06CM00805 375 W. Blacklidge Dr. Townhouses? (Apartments) Site Plan Transmittal date: 2nd Review 8/31/06 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. If the parcel to the west side of the property is to be split from the rest of the property. A completed lot split, lot reconfiguration, and or lot combination must be completed before approval of the site plan will be granted. Provide documentation verifying completion. If the parcel is to be split off from the rest of this project, remove the parcel from this site plan and any notes pertaining to "Parcel A". The following comment will remain as a reminder to the reviewer. DS 2-02.2.1.2 The legal description provided is incorrect. The proposed site is a series of lots in block 24. A lot combination will be required to combine the lots into one parcel. Lot Combo documentation can be picked up at DSD front counter. The lot combo must be completed and the new legal description provided before the site plan will be approved. 2. DS 2-202.2.1.7 Provide a dimension from the buildings to point of measurement, even if greater than the required setback. In this case the point of measurement is the back of curb. The required setback along Blacklidge Drive and Balboa Ave is 21' or the height of the structure, which ever is greater, from the nearest adjacent travel lane. If parking lanes are not provided along Blacklidge Dr. the measurement is from the back of curb. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.8 In detail 1 of 3 the handicap parking signage is located in the overhang area for the vehicular parking, relocate. Clearly indicate with dimensions the location of the wheel stops. Minimum 2'-6" from curb. The access to the handicap parking spaces as indicated on the plans does not meet ADA standards. Provide a crosswalk from one of the access aisles to the handicap ramp. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide the following: Off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage. Indicate the location of the class 1 bicycle parking spaces and provide a detail of the bicycle enclosure. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.10 Provide the location of existing and future sight visibility triangles. See engineering comments. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Per DS 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required. The accessible route must connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This accessible route may be identical to the pedestrian circulation path. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all places of public accommodation, all buildings, all parking spaces designated for use by the physically disabled, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas adjacent to accessible buildings, and all other common use areas. Areas within the development which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path, as listed above, are also not required to provide an accessible route in those areas as long as at least one (1) accessible route is provided from at least one (1) street fronting on the development to the main entrance of the development on the site. D. Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. The handicap ramps as indicated on the plan and in detail 10 of 4 are not allowed to extend in to the vehicular use area. Indicate the location of the wedge curb as indicated on the plan. The design of the handicap ramp as indicated does not meet ADA standards. The handicap ramps as indicated on the plan are not allowed to be located in the driveways of the units. Indicate clearly the handicap ramps and cross walks to connect the interior sidewalks with the pedestrian circulation path to the streets. The location of the truncated domes as indicated on detail 10 of 4 are incorrect. They are to be located at the transition point from pavement to ramp. Minimum width is 24". Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide the type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage. See following comments regarding the existing billboard. Provide the location of and detail for the required handicap parking signage. The detail provided does not meet City of Tucson requirements. A copy of the approved signage can be obtained at the front counter for zoning at DSD. The minimum height from grade to the bottom of the sign is 7'-0". 8. DS 2-02.2.1.19 Clearly indicate the future right of way as per the MS&R map. Provide the future curb location by dimension from the future right of way. See engineering comments. 9. DS 2-02.2.2.A Provide the following in the land use data section on page 1: 1. The proposed density as well as the allowed. 10. The floor plans for the buildings on page A-3 indicate detached garages. The site plan indicates the garages as being attached. Clarify. 11. Based on changes made to the site plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. |
| 08/31/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/07/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/07/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |