Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM00805
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2006 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per COT amendments to IFC 2003, Apendix D, "No Parking, Fire Access Lane" signs required. 2) Per IFC, 2003, Section 508.5.1,On-Site fire hydrants required. Fire sprinklers in buildings would be considered as an alternative. |
| 02/23/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Peter Salonga DATE: February 23, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet Engineering Division SUBJECT: 375 W. Blacklidge Dr. Oracle 21 Homes Site plan T06CM00805 (First Review) T13S, R13E, Section 36 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1) Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2) The SP contents and information are shown on Sheets 1 and 2. Please do the following: a) Change the title of Sheet 1 to read "Site Plan". (This will also match the Sheet Index on Sheet 1). b) Change the title of Sheet 2 to read "Grading Plan". (This will also match the Sheet Index on Sheet 1). c) Include all other comments, unless specifically noted, on the Sheet labeled "Site Plan". 3) A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this project. Submit revised Grading Plan and SWPPP with submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. 4) Please provide a legend. 5) Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6) Please extend the contours of the site to illustrate the drainage pattern along Balboa Ave. and Blacklidge Dr. Address the stormwater runoff on Balboa Ave. entering and ponding in the northeast (NE) retention basin. 7) If possible, please distribute the flow from the southwest retention basin evenly rather than concentrate the flow going into Oracle Rd. 8) Remember to submit the detail for the driveway apron. 9) The drainage flow arrows, finished spot grades, topography and the finished floor elevations need to be shown on Sheet 1. 10) The basis of bearings and the basis of elevation needs to be noted on Sheet 1. 11) Please provide typical sections of the on-site P.A.A.L.s. 12) Ensure there is a minimum 2 feet separation from the back of the wedge curb to the sidewalk. 13) Please provide the dimensioned right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19 on Sheet 1. 14) Please provide dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21 on Sheet 1. 15) Please provide the detailed information for the refuse container location, size and access thereto, fully dimensioned. 16) On Sheet 3, Detail 3 calls out a 6-inch CMU Block Wall. The Reference Detail 3A calls out an 8-inch wall. Please clarify. 17) Please provide the typical detail information for Keynotes # 15 (riprap drainage swales) and # 16 (for the Southwest basin). 18) Please provide more information re: the construction of the retention / detention basins, either on the site plan or the grading plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1188 Suzanne Bohnet, Engineer Associate City of Tucson / Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue / P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1188 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 03/01/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0.C. |
| 03/01/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with information specified within DS 2-07.0. 2. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0.C. 3. Review will continue upon re-submittal of requested documents. |
| 04/06/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Lead Planner Principal Planner PROJECT:T06CM00805 375 W. Blacklidge Dr. Townhouses? (Apartments) Site Plan Transmittal date:1st Review 4/12/06 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-02.2.1.2 The legal description provided is incorrect. The proposed site is a series of lots in block 24. A lot combination will be required to combine the lots into one parcel. Lot Combo documentation can be picked up at DSD front counter. The lot combo must be completed and the new legal description provided before the site plan will be approved. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.6 Please clarify the following: 1. The building elevations provided indicate all buildings are 3 bedroom units. 2. The site plan indicates buildings types as "A" and "B", elevations indicate building types "D","E", and "F". 3. Clearly indicate if garages or carports are being used. 4. On the site plan it appears the garages or carports are attached to all of the buildings. On the elevation plans it appears some of the garages/carports are detached. 5. Provide dimensions on the elevations clearly indicating the heights of the differing corners of the structures. These dimensions must be from adjacent grade level not from finished floor elevation 6. The maximum height of a structure per development designator "L" is 25'. Clearly indicate the height from grade to the roof line and the height of the parapet. The elevations scale out as being greater than 27' in height above adjacent grade. 7. Provide dimensions on the floor plans clearly indicating the size of the garage/carports as well as the footprint of the buildings. 3. DS 2-202.2.1.7 The required setback along Blacklidge Drive and Balboa Ave is 21' or the height of the structure, which ever is greater, from the nearest adjacent travel lane. If parking lanes are not provided along Blacklidge Dr. the measurement is from the back of curb. Provide a cross section of Blacklidge Dr. and Balboa clearly indicating if parking lanes are existing or not. The indicated setback of 21' is incorrect if the buildings are 27' in height as scaled on the elevation drawings.. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.8 Per the 2003 IBC Sec. 1106 the required number of handicap parking spaces is based on Table 1106.1. The number of parking spaces being provided is 100 thus requiring 4 handicap parking spaces with one of the handicap parking spaces being van accessible. Clearly indicate the location of the 4 required handicap parking spaces. Provide a dimensioned detail of the handicap parking space, van accessible handicap parking space and a standard parking space. The handicap parking spaces indicted do not appear to meet the dimensional requirements for length, please clarify. The access to the handicap parking spaces as indicated on the plans does not meet ADA standards. The handicap ramp is to be located at the head of the access aisle and connecting to the pedestrian circulation route (sidewalk). Provide wheel stops or barriers at parking spaces to prevent overhanging of sidewalks or damage to any buildings, fences, walls, landscaping, etc. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide the following: Off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.10 Provide the location of existing and future sight visibility triangles. 7. DS 2-02.2.1.11 Clearly indicate the width of the PAALs at the ingress/egress from Blacklidge Dr. Indicate the direction of the one-way PAAL located at the southeast corner of the property. See engineering comments for possible radius curb requirements and type of handicap ramp required at this location. The entrance from Blacklidge Dr. may not be allowed in the indicated location based on the future widening of Oracle Rd. The handicap ramps at this location do not meet ADA standards. See engineering comments for this area also. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.12 Per DS 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required. The accessible route must connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This accessible route may be identical to the pedestrian circulation path. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all places of public accommodation, all buildings, all parking spaces designated for use by the physically disabled, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas adjacent to accessible buildings, and all other common use areas. Areas within the development which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path, as listed above, are also not required to provide an accessible route in those areas as long as at least one (1) accessible route is provided from at least one (1) street fronting on the development to the main entrance of the development on the site. Per DS 2-08.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks, and must meet the following locational requirements. A. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. B. A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. (See Figure 1.) C. A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. (See Figure 2.) D. Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street. E. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. F. Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas may not be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. Clearly indicate the minimum required width of all sidewalks as being 4'. Sidewalks are missing from Balboa Ave. connecting to the pedestrian circulation for the site. Sidewalks are missing in front of the parking spaces between the buildings at the southeast corner of the property and at the indicated handicap parking spaces. Indicate clearly the handicap ramps and cross walks to connect the interior sidewalks with the pedestrian circulation path to the streets. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. Clearly indicate the accessible pedestrian circulation path to the pool area. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide the type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage. See following comments regarding the existing billboard. Provide the location of and detail for the required handicap parking signage. Provide the height and size of the existing billboard. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5 and 3.4.4.1.B.3 A loading zone is required for all existing and proposed billboards. Indicate the location, size and PAAL that will service the existing billboard. 10. DS 2-02.2.1.19 Clearly indicate the future right of way as per the MS&R map. Provide the future curb location by dimension from the future right of way. 11. DS 2-02.2.1.20 If applicable, all easements of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 12. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide proposed lighting layout and type. 13. DS 2-02.2.1.31 The indicated use as Townhouses appears to be incorrect. Townhouses are required to have property lines and for this type of development would require CDRC submittal for a residential cluster project. It appears the correct use for this project would be multi-family residential (apartments). Please correct the title block. Clearly indicate the proposed use of "Parcel "A" . 14. DS 2-02.2.2.A Provide the following in the land use data section on page 1: 1. Bicycle parking spaces required and provided. 2. Number of loading spaces required and provided 15. Based on changes made to the site plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. |
| 04/12/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/13/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |