Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM00804
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2006 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | February 24, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM00804 PROJECT NAME: Callecita Villas PROJECT ADDRESS: 209 E. Limberlost Dr PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Civil Engineer Resubmittal required; the following items must be revised or added to the Site Plan. Site Plan 1. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. Include plans/redlines from previous plan submittal. 2. Indicate estimated cut and fill quantities. Delineate Grading Limits. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.17 3. If applicable, indicate all easements of record to be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 4. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways and utility lines. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.21 5. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Units 4 through 8 appear to be in excess of 2' above existing grade, please address. 6. Callout existing sidewalks along Limberlost Drive. If no sidewalk exist then a new 6' wide sidewalk needs to be provided along Limberlost. 7. Demonstrate and fully dimension solid waste vehicle maneuverability on-site. The proposed maneuverability may not be accessible. If maneuverability does not meet standards please contact John Clark of Environmental Services @ 791-3175 ext. 1136 to reach an agreement on the layout for solid waste access and if the solution does not meet Development Standards 6-01 a DSMR may be required. 8. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated into the development by conveying rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas. Please address how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for design considerations. 9. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 10. Please verify with zoning that the 20' wide PAAL (detail B/3) entering the site will be allowed. The minimum width may need to be 24' and the sidewalks may need a 1 foot setback from the edge of the structure. 11. Limberlost is a Major Street and Route therefore standard returns need to be provided. The minimum return for a PAAL to a collector road is 25'. Drainage Report 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Site Plan review purposes only and may require additional modifications during the Grading Plan stages. 2. Address the maintenance responsibility for all drainage facilities (including retention basins) in the Drainage Report and provide a maintenance checklist. We also recommend including a copy of the check list in the CC & R's to allow the Home Owners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 3. Due to the fact that Stone Wash has the capacity to handle additional storm water and the close proximity of the site in respect to Rillito River is there a possibility of routing some of the on-site flows to Stone Wash to minimize the size of the retention basin? If you have any questions or would like to meet with me before your next submittal, you may contact me at 791-5640 ext.1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/28/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee per LUC3.7.2.4.3. Provide approval documentation for landscaping within ROW. 2. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use areas from adjacent residential zoned properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. Verify if existing screen walls are located on site. 3. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4. A 6' wall is required to screen refuse storage from adjacent residential zoned properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. Dimension all planters within vehicle use area on the landscape plan. 6. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 7. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/01/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/02/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner PROJECT: T06CM00804 209 E Limber Lost Drive Site Plan for a Multi-Family development TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 2, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with development standards 2-02 site content and specifications. Additional review for compliance with development standards, 2-08, 2-09, 3-01, and 3-05 has been made. This plan has also been reviewed for compliance with development criteria as listed in the LUC for development designator "K", multi-family residential. 2. Please review the legal description text block and revise as follows: "HAYNES RILLITO S192' OF W400' OF LOT 16 EXC SPNDRL & EXC W110' FOR RDS". Also revise the typo "TOE". DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 3. Label on sheet two, the building dimensions and the overall height for all building footprints. (All proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use should be labeled and dimensioned.) It appears that the buildings are typical with two units each. In lieu of dimensioning all building footprints on the plan, add a typical building footprint detail drawing with dimensions and heights. The drawing should include any stairwells, balconies, overhangs, porches etc. DS 2-02.2.1.A.6 4. The following setbacks apply to this project. Three streets surround the project of which two are streets designated as major streets on the MS&R map. The street perimeter building setback is to be based on the greater of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the back of future curb location for both Stone Avenue and Limberlost Drive. The street perimeter building setback along Ponderosa Street frontage is to be based on the greater of 21 feet or the height of the structure measured from the nearest edge of travel lane. Please add the requested information on sheet one or two. DS 2-02.2.1A.7 5. Off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage. Three bicycle parking spaces are required for this use. Per LUC 3.3.4 Vehicle parking requirements, this project must be provided with bicycle parking at eight percent of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Fifty percent must be class one and fifty percent must be class two facilities. Based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided, 3 bicycle parking spaces are required. All three spaces can be class two facilities. Please draw the locations for the bicycle parking spaces and add the bicycle parking calculation to the first sheet. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 6. Sight visibility triangle must be depicted on the plan. Add the sight visibility triangle at all street intersections to ensure that no part of the development will be constructed within the SVT's. DS 2-02.2.1.A.10 7. The minimum width for the driveway entrance is 24 feet for two-way traffic. The driveway/PAAL off Limberlost Drive does not meet the minimum width requirement. Please revise the PAAL to 24 feet. DS 2-02.2.1.A.11 8. The access ramps at the West End of the PAAL plan should be revised to depict a continuous pedestrian circulation. The access ramps have been depicted with the ramps toward the parking spaces along the west end of the project. The ramps should be revised to provide a direct continuous path to each other. In addition, a crosswalk should be drawn and labeled at both locations where the access ramps have been provided. The proposed 20-foot wide PAAL does not meet the minimum width requirements as mentioned above. Also, a minimum five pedestrian refuge area with a four-foot wide sidewalk is required between the PAAL and the enclosed buildings. As mentioned above, please redesign this area to meet code. DS 2-02.2.1.A.12 9. If applicable indicate the location, size, and type of existing or proposed freestanding signage including billboards. DS 2-02.2.1.A.13 10. Draw and label the existing and future full right of way for both Stone Avenue and Limberlost Drive. The existing and future right of way line, curb and sidewalk must be shown. The street perimeter building setbacks are based on location of both the existing future curb locations. If the full rights of way have not been dedicated at this time the design of the development will have to designed to meet the building setbacks as well as any other development criteria that may affect the site due to the future widening. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 and .21 11. If applicable, existing or proposed easements must be drawn and labeled on the plan. The location, width, purposes, and for existing easements the recordation information must be listed. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 12. If applicable, draw and label proposed freestanding lighting. The type lighting and the height of the light poles should be listed on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.25 13. See the landscape reviewer comments related to the requirements for landscape borders, screening and NPPO. It does appear that the proposed six-foot high walls may fall within the sight visibility triangles. If this is the case the walls may be constructed in the SVT if the wall is 30 inches tall and a wrought iron fence is installed above the 30 inches with the pickets at 12 inches on center, (Per previous determination by Lonnie Wiles with Traffic Department) DS 2-02.2.1.A.27 14. Revise general note 2 to list the correct subject to section number. The subject to section number is 3.5.7.1.F. Section 3.2.6.is the section for setbacks please remove this number. DS 2-02.2.1.A.31 15. If applicable, any approvals, such as Development Review Board, Lot Development Option, Board of Adjustment, Historic District Advisory Board, and Historical Commission. The case number, date of approval, and the conditions of approval must be listed on the plan. If this is applicable a copy of the approval letter for any of the above must be included with the site plan submittal prior to final approval of the site plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.38 16. Please clarify or revise the lot coverage calculations to include the following information. It is not clear per the coverage calculation if the building footprint includes the garage and if the vehicular use area includes the driveway approach to the garage. Please provide a breakdown of the areas used for the calculation. DS 2-02.2.2.A.1 and .3 17. Please add a density calculation. The calculation should include the number of units allowed and the number proposed. DS 2-02.2.2.A 18. It is apparent that this plan has been designed with the intent to convert the development from apartments to condos at some point in the future. This plan has been drawn with many of the typical notes normally associated with a plat and should be removed. In addition clarify if the limited common areas or uses are to be reserved by some form of CC&R's or exclusive easements? Please clarify. 19. Additional comments will be forthcoming based on the responses to the comments and revisions made to the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T06CM00804.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/04/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | see zoning comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/09/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/09/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |