Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM00697
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/18/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information: · Peruvian Verbena (Verbena peruviana) will not cover 25-sq. ft. per plant revise the number of plants required for coverage. · The location of individual plants 1 gallon or larger in size. Include the exact number of plants on landscape planting plan. · Ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover. Plant symbols need to be larger to verify coverage. Red Bird of Paradise (Caesalpinia pulcherrima) is considered a shrub, and Peruvian Verbena (Verbena peruviana) is a ground cover, revise-planting plan as necessary. 2. Submit a NPP plan in accordance with DS 2-15.0 3. A plant professional, such as required under Sec. 3.8.6.7.D shall perform preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan: A. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. B. A landscape architect. C. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/19/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a NPP plan in accordance with DS 2-15.0 2. A plant professional, such as required under Sec. 3.8.6.7.D shall perform preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan: A. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. B. A landscape architect. C. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/31/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Paul Nzomo DATE: August 30, 2006 Coronado Engineering & Delvelopment, Inc. 1010 N. Finance Center Drive, Ste. 200 Tucson, Arizona 85705 SUBJECT: Pantano Homes, 2491 S. Pantano Pw Site plan T06CM00697 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Drainage Report. The Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Drainage Report: 1. Show rip-rap on the x-sections of the basins along with mirafi filter fabric and the WSEL's. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/2491 S. Pantano PW Site2 |
| 07/31/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | approved conditionally upon the completion of the previous comments. |
| 09/08/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: PANTANO MULTI-FAMILY HOMES T06CM00697 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 11, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. If the five lots are to remain as individual lots show the lot lines on the site plan along with the dimensions and bearings. D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 2. Based on the information provided in regards to the individual lots, each building must meet the required setback for the lot. The provided floor plan shows an overall width at the Northeast end of the building at 31' with 30' shown on the site plan, clarify. Also the provided floor plan shows a covered porch at the entry for each unit. Based on the height of the porch of 9'-7 to finished floor and an additional 5" to design grade the setback to the porch would be 10'-0", based on your dimension from finished floor, this said the required interior setbacks between buildings where the front entrances face each other does not meet the minimum required, 10' from the porch to the property line. Also the Northwest setback to the property line does not meet the minimum required, 10' from the porch to the property line. D.S. 2-02.2.1.7 3. The truncated domes located at the handicap parking spaces and access aisles are incorrect. If the sidewalk is flush with the pavement in this area per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 "Detectable warnings (truncated domes) shall be 24" minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface". D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 4. The handicapped ramps shown in the right-of-way should be called out has Curb access ramps per COT/PC Standard Details for Public Improvement #207, Truncated domes to be used in place of tactical groves. D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 5. The detail for the handicap sign is not correct. The height and verbiage of the sign are to be as per Park Wise specifications. See redline on sheet 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 6. There are "PARKING/DRAINAGE/PED. EASEMENTS" called out on the site plan, delineate on plan and provide recordation information, docket & page. D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 7. The "MAX. LOT COVERAGE = 75% not 73%, revise. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 8. The parking calculation is incorrect. Per LUC 3.3.4 "Multifamily Dwellings 0-70 units/acre - two bedroom units require 2 spaces and three bedroom units require 2.25, requiring a total of 31. Revised the parking calculation. 2-02.2.2.A.4 9. The Class 2 bicycle parking detail does not meet the current requirement of 30" from the side of the pad, see Figure 9 - Required Bike Parking Space Dimension, DS 2-09. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\t06cm00697.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/12/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | See Zoning Comments |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/25/2006 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/25/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |