Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL TI
Permit Number - T06CM00580
Review Name: COMMERCIAL TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
02/02/2006 | JIM EGAN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
02/02/2006 | CHRISTY FOREMAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS DATE: 2/2/06 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06CM00580 PROJECT NAME: SUNSTATE BANK PROJECT ADDRESS: 2951 E. GRANT RD. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: WARD HOLLON PROJECT REVIEWER: CHRISTY FOREMAN TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CFOREMA1@CI.TUCSON.AZ.US IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS. 1) NEED TO PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING BUILDING TO CLARIFY BUILDING IS UNDER THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE. 2) CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY REQUIRES TENANT SPACE TO BE FULLY ACCESSIBLE SEE SECTION 3409. "B" OCCUPANCY OF 31 OCCUPANTS REQUIRES 1 MENS AND 1 WOMENS ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM PER ANSI A117.1 2003. PROVIDE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR ALL FIXTURES. 3) VERTICAL GRAB BAR PER ANSI 2003 A117.1 SECTION 604.5.1. 4) DOOR 112 APPEARS TO BE LOCATED WHERE SOMEONE COULD BE HIT IF STANDING AT BREAK ROOM SINK. 5) PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR NEW OPENING IN EXTERIOR WALL FOR DOOR #115 IN THE WORK ROOM. |
02/07/2006 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | needs 8th floor wastewater credit evaluation. needs addressing review-2955 E Grant Rd per addressing. |
02/13/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The applicable code for all commercial plumbing projects is the 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code with Local Amendments. 2. Revise the scale noted on the construction documents to match the actual scale shown on the drawings. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 3. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 4. Provide information to show how the outlet temperature of the hot water is to be limited to 110 degrees at the lavatory. Reference Section 804.3, IECC 2000. 5. If the specified water heater is not supplied with integral heat traps, provide heat traps on the supply and discharge piping. Reference Section 804.4, IECC 2003. 6. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference Section 310.0, UPC 2003. 6. The design of the water heater piping, with a check valve located between the water heater and the expansion tank, makes it impossible for the expansion tank to accommodate the thermal expansion of the water in the water heater, as intended by Section 608.3, UPC 2003. |
02/13/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
02/13/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The 2003 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project. 2. Revise the scale noted on the construction documents to match the actual scale shown on the drawings. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 3. Provide information to show how the condensate drain system has been sized. Reference Section 307.2.2, IMC 2003, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. Recirculation of ventilation air from toilet rooms is prohibited (i.e. when the lights are turned off in the restrooms, the supply air will be recirculated to the building). Reference Table 403.2.1 (3), IMC 2003. 5. Revise the ventilation calculations to take into account the different occupancy loads in the project space (i.e. not everything is an office). Reference Sections 403.3 and 403.3.2, IMC 2003. |
02/15/2006 | BOB SUBA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1.provide exterior egress lighting or detail on existing back up lighting. 2.Re-check circuit loads .For example "P-2-10 should be calculated at 900 watts not 720.Please review all loads prior to next submittal and revise all lods accordingly. |
03/24/2006 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | Tenant Improvement of existing bank with drive through lane. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
03/29/2006 | AMERY KLAPPERT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
03/29/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |