Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T06CM00514
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2006 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/16/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 02/16/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with information specified within DS 2-07.0. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans per DS 2-01.2.1.C. Submit a separate landscape plan. 2. Street landscape borders are required, a street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Refuse enclosure can not be located within landscape border. 3. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 4. Interior landscape borders are required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC 3.7.2-I. 5. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 6. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g 7. The planting plan and layout calculations will include the following Information: · Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material must be listed. · Locations, size, and name of all existing vegetation to remain in place. · All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. Indicate treatment for landscaped areas. 8. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 9. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zoned properties (including adjacent office zone) per LUC Table 3.7.2-1. Remove reference to optional patio walls on site plan. 10. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 11. Submit NPPO plan or Application for Exception per DS 2-15.2.0.C 12. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/08/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Alex Garcia DATE: March 9, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet Engineering Division SUBJECT: 375 E. Elvado Rd - 2 Duplexes Site plan T06CM00514 (First Review) T15S, R13E, Section 13 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Report. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. Site Plan: 1. The subject property exists within a mapped flood hazard area, as shown on the City of Tucson Flood Hazard Maps. Please provide a Drainage Report that addresses potential drainage concerns as a result of the proposed development. The Drainage Report needs to include the limits of the 100-year floodplain and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). If the proposed development lies within the determined floodplain, a Floodplain Use Permit will be required for development. If the proposed structure(s) lie within the determined floodplain, the lowest finished floor (FFE) of the proposed structures must be a minimum of 1.0 foot above the determined BFE and verified by an elevation certificate. For any development within the floodplain, an encroachment analysis will be required to ensure the proposed development will not cause adverse flooding conditions off-property. Depending on the circumstances, water harvesting may also be required. 2. Please ensure the vertical datum referenced in the Drainage Report matches the vertical datum on the SP, and show the floodplain limits, the FFE, the vertical datum and the proposed drainage patterns (flow arrows) on the SP. 3. Please show existing and finished topography. 4. Please provide the Basis of Bearings for the lot. 5. The legend indicates a fence depicted by the same pattern used to indicate an optional block wall on the plot plan. Please verify whether it is a fence, and if so what kind, or a block wall, revising the detail as necessary. If it is a block wall, please identify the location of the property line on the wall detail. Also, provide either the consent of the neighbors to allow the wall to be built directly on the property line or setback the wall from the property line a minimum of 2 feet. This will ensure the footers for the wall will be entirely within the boundaries of the subject property. 6. If the proposed wall lies within the determined floodplain, openings designed by an engineer to allow the passage of floodwaters is required to ensure the wall will not create adverse flooding conditions off-property. Please provide a detail for the block wall with engineered openings. If the wall is not to be built at this time, add to the detail, "Block wall by separate permit". 7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Be advised that if the total amount of fill equals or exceeds 50 cubic yards, a Grading Permit and Grading will be required for this project. The Site Plan and Grading Plan details can be included on the same sheet. If so, please re-label the Site Plan sheet as Site/Grading Plan. 8. Please clarify if a curb exists. If so, please provide a minimum 5-foot sidewalk. 9. Please provide the dimensions for the Right of Way (ROW), as well as the dimensions from the centerline of the ROW to existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks. 10. If wheelchair ramps are required, please provide and show truncated domes on all handicap ramps. 11. Please clarify the pedestrian access areas by clearly showing the indicated sidewalks. 12. The 4-foot concrete sidewalk must be setback a minimum of 2 feet from the property boundary. 13. The proposed curbs at the parking location on the east property boundary must be setback a minimum of 2 feet from the boundary per D.S. 11-01. 14. Please explain why the standard details are not being used for the vertical curbs (as shown by Details 2 and 3 on Sheet 1). Also, please clarify why the term "optional" is used in the descriptions for the details. 15. Detail 2 as indicated on the SP does not appear to match the detail planview callout. Please clarify. 16. Please draw the plans to a standard engineering scale no larger than 1" = 60' per D.S. 2-02.2.1A. 17. Please ensure that all lettering and dimensions are the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size to assure the letterins is legible when repordced or when phtographically reduced for record-keeping purposes per D.S. 2-03.2.1C. 18. The proposed access for the refuse containers show the collection vehicle will have to back out into traffice on E. Elvado St. Per D.S. 6-01.4.1I, containers are to be placed so that the collection vehicle does not have to back into moving traffic, on or off the premises. The refuse container access will either need to be changed or approved through a Development Services Modification Request (DSMR). Please check with John Clark of Environment Services for suggestions and/or pre-approval. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1188. Suzanne Bohnet, Engineer Associate City of Tucson / Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue / P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1188 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 04/12/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens FOR: David Rivera Lead Planner Principal Planner PROJECT:T06CM00514 375 E. Elvado Rd Two Duplexes Site Plan Transmittal date:1st Review 4/12/06 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The property for this proposed project was originally part of a larger lot. The original lot was part of a subdivision plat which was divided in 1998 into 3 parcels. A lot in a subdivision plat can only be split into two parcels unless some type of lot split exception, record of survey, minor subdivision or other instrument of platting was used. Provide documentation that verifies the lot split has been approved by Development Services. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.5 Provide bearings for all property lines. 3. DS -202.2.1.6 Provide a dimensioned floor and elevation plan for the proposed duplexes. The elevations should be dimensioned from the adjacent grade to the top of wall. The floor plan is in order to verify parking requirements. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.8 Wheel stops or barriers are required at the parking spaces located to the east side of the property line in order to prevent damage to the wall or overhanging the property line. See DS 3-05.2.3.C for criteria for barriers. The parking space located adjacent to the refuse container wall is required to be ten (10) feet in width as per DS 3-05.2.1.B.3. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.9 Provide off-street bicycle parking, including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage. 6. DS 2-02.2.1.10 The sight visibility triangles do not appear to be indicated correctly. See engineering comments 7. DS 2-02.2.1.13 If applicable, provide location, type, size, and height of existing and proposed signage. 8. DS 2-02.2.1.20 If applicable, provide all easements of record on the plan with recording docket and page. 9. DS 2-02.2.1.25 If applicable, provide the existing and proposed lighting layout and type of pole and fixture. 10. This project is located within the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ) overlay for the Airport Hazards District (AHD). See LUC Sec. 2.8.5.11. Provide on the plan the Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevation for the SW end of the runway for TIA (2,561 feet), the MSL elevation of the lot, the MSL elevation at the height of the structure, the difference between the MSL elevation of the structure and the MSL elevation required by the AHD map which is eighty (80) feet above the end of the runway. These can be indicated as a set of calculations on the site plan. 11. DS 2-20.2.2.A.2 On the site plan indicate the dimensions of the proposed structures. In the calculations provide the square footage of each structure. In the calculations provide the number of required and proposed bicycle parking spaces. 12. The refuse container cannot be located in the required landscape area and it does appear that pickup vehicle will be able to maneuver in and out with out backing into the street. See landscape and engineering comments. 13. Depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. |
| 04/13/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2006 | JMORALE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/18/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |