Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T06CM00227
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Coordinate the orientation of the building with the civil and architectural drawings. (The building is rotated 180 degrees compared to the civil and architectural drawings.) Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2003. 2. Provide information to show how the proposed water heater support is to be connected to the building structure. (Detail 1/P0.01 shows the assembly holding the water heater but does not show how that assembly is attached to the building structure.) Reference Section 314.5, UPC 2003. 3. The branch pipe sizing chart shown on sheet P0.01 allows for water velocities greater than 10 feet per second. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 fps for the copper piping. (If you check the footnote on the ASPE Data Book table you are using, you will see that at 8 psi/100 feet, the velocity of the 1-1/2" pipe is greater than 8 fps and the velocity of the 2" and 2-1/2" pipes are greater than 10 fps.) Reference Section A 6.1, UPC 2003; IAPMO IS 3-2000, Section 610.0. Note that the Sloan Royal flush valve flows at approximately 25 gallons per minute during a flush cycle. |
| 02/09/2007 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/09/2007 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope. Reference Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2003. |
| 02/12/2007 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/12/2007 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEEDS MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT(8TH FLOOR REVIEW & 5TH FLOOR PERMIT) |
| 02/12/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Please walk the building plans through the zoning counter once the structural review division has approved the building plans. Be sure to provide a copy of the development plan and apply for a yellow site card at the permit counter to convert the development plan into a site plan for records. |
| 02/16/2007 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Provide an approved site plan. This building plan can be approved once the site plan has been approved. |
| 03/08/2007 | LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | March 6, 2007 CITY OF TUCSON - FIRST CHECK Tucson Appl. No. T06CM00227 Bureau Veritas Job No. 01007-161001.016 Maurita N.H. Walker 502 S. College Ave. Ste 203 Tempe, Arizona 85281 Re: Plan Review: US Bank – STRUCTURAL ONLY Address: 7685 E. Broadway Blvd Dear Mr. Walker, Bureau Veritas North America has completed a first review of the following documents on behalf of the City of Tucson: Plans: Three (3) sets of building plans (51 sheets, G100 through R001) dated January 4, 2007 by Joseph A. Tyndall. Structural Calculations: Two (2) sets of calculations dated May 9, 2006 by Christopher L. Harper. Geotechnical Report: Two (2) sets of Geotechnical Engineering Report by LMT Engineering Inc. Miscellaneous: Two (2) sets of project manuals dated May 2, 2006 by Joseph A. Tyndall. These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Building Codes (i.e., State of Arizona and Tucson amended 2003 IRC, 2003 IMC, 2002 NEC and 2003 IPC). Please submit an itemized response letter and required number of complete and revised documents with all revisions clouded. Sincerely, Bureau Veritas North America Randy McCoy ICC Plans Examiner RM:pc s:\Tucson\1007-161001.016pc1 enclosures Re: Stories: One Occupancy/Const.: VB Building Area (sq. ft.): 3200 (Business) 600 (Canopy) 3800 Total sq. ft. A. The following plan review comments are based on the City of Tucson Building Regulations and referred to the 2003 International Building Code. B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully, approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. These plan review comments are based on building code items only. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., County Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Please provide proper reference table for fire-resistance rating requirements for building elements (hours). IBC 106; (code data 2.1). Several beams noted and calculated in the structural calculations do no correspond with the Beam Schedule on sheet S2.2 Several lintels noted and calculated in the structural calculations do not correspond with the Lintel Schedule on sheet S2.2. Framing plan denotes lintel LT, but LT is not included in Lintel Schedule. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Randy McCoy at (520) 820-1980 between 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., M-F. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/14/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |