Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T06BU02967
Parcel: 12513002B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL

Permit Number - T06BU02967
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/19/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: August 20, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06BU02967
PROJECT NAME: Walgreens
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2300 East Speedway Blvd.
PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert

The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: ONE COPY OF THE APPROVED SITE PLAN, FOUR COPIES OF THE GRADING PLAN AND THE SWPPP


SWPPP COMMENTS

1. The operator responsible for day to day activities (the contractor) and the operator with control over plans and specifications (owner/engineer) is required to submit an NOI to the state and a copy to the City of Tucson. Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and a copy to the City of Tucson. Submit two copies of the NOIs filled out and signed by the appropriate parties. (Part IV.F) Fourth request.
08/20/2007 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied 08/20/07

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

David Rivera
Principal Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan at this time.

The grading plan has been reviewed for consistency with the approved and stamped site/landscape plan and while it was found not be 100% consistent with the approved site plan the inconsistencies are not major but do affect landscaping. While the grading plan appears to be the plan that will be used out on the field to build off of, it does not match the site plan. Having said that, if the site is to be constructed based on the grading plan, the site and landscape plans may have to be revised and re-stamped.

2. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
08/21/2007 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/25/2007 VFLORES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/25/2007 VFLORES1 REJECT SHELF Completed