Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU02936
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 2, 2007 SUBJECT: Site Plan and Grading Plan Lot 176- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Baker and Associates Engineering, Inc. LOCATION: 2111 E Valencia Road; T15S R14E Sec08, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Patricia Gilbert for Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM06322 (Site Plan) and T06BU02936 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: It is acknowledge that the 1-foot no access easement is in the recordation process, the docket and page of the easement must be shown on the site plan prior to approval. The above comment is from the first review and still applies. The response to this comment was a request to put the recordation data on the mylar. This is a site plan review and submittal of mylars is not a Development Services requirement. Recordation data must be on the site plan. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval. 2) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: On the plan view, within the basin for design criteria of the weir opening (detail 2) and curb/wall openings (detail 3) references details do not match the subject. Detail 2 and detail 3 are for typical parking stalls. Revise appropriately. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP is approvable once the grading plan is approved. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan (3 copies) and 3 copies of the SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Be advised due to the fact there are only two comments outstanding an over the counter review can be conducted by Jason Green (837-4929) or Patricia Gilbert (837-4936) |
| 06/11/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Until the site plan is approved and engineering and landscape have approved the grading plan, zoning is not able to approve the grading plan. Staff can continue the review once the above has been accomplished. It should be noted that the grading plan should have PAAL widths called out, all curbs identified, truncated domes and handicapped ramps called out with slope information. The grading plan requires resubmittal. |
| 06/11/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/13/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | REJECT SHELF | Completed |