Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU02855
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit an NPPO plan or application for exception per DS 2-15.0 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL STANDARDS. A Native Plant Preservation Plan shall consist of the information itemized according to the preservation and mitigation methodology chosen by the applicant. Plant Inventory Methodology A Native Plant Inventory shall containing the following elements: 1. All Viable Protected Native Plants shall be tagged with an embossed metal, or approved equal, inventory number. Only the Protected Native Plants required to be either Preserved in Place (PIP) or Transplanted on Site (TOS) shall be tagged. 2. A list of all Protected Native Plants as designated in Sec. 3.8.5 of the LUC located on the site including all Saguaros; all trees with a caliper of at least four (4) inches measured at six (6) inches for single-trunked specimens and twelve (12) inches for multi-trunked specimens above grade level at the base of the tree, per Sec. 6.2.3 of the LUC; all shrubs equal to or greater than three (3) feet in height; all succulents equal to two (2) feet in height or greater; and all cacti. The list shall include the identification number, genus and species, and size. If the Plant Inventory Methodology is chosen, then the Native Plant Viability and Transplantability Status (see Sec. 2-15.3.2) of all Protected Native Plants on the site shall be listed. If the Plant Appraisal Methodology is chosen, then the appraisal value of each plant removed from the site shall be listed. 3. An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, at a minimum scale of 1" = 60' showing the site's boundaries, the locations of all Protected Native Plants within those boundaries, and the \plants' identification numbers keyed to the inventory list in Sec. 2- 15.3.1.A.2. Any aerial photograph submitted, which was taken more than one (1) year prior to submittal, shall be accompanied by a letter stating that the site is substantially unchanged from the date of the aerial photograph. Based upon the analysis, a landscape shall be prepared to include the ultimate disposition of transplanted and mitigated Native Plants into common areas; landscaped areas as required by the Landscaping and Screening Regulations. |
| 05/21/2007 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | May 21, 2007 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T06BU02855 Grading Plans 8810 East Perillo Place Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with a site plan for this site approved by Zoning Review. THERE MUST BE A SITE PLAN FOR THIS SITE. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 06/21/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2007 | VFLORES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/29/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |