Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU02613
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2006 | SUZANNE BOHNET | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 13, 2006 FROM: Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Division SUBJECT: 375 W. Blacklidge Dr. Oracle 21 Homes Site Plan T06CM00805 (Third Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please include a response letter to the comments below along with the corrected copies of the Site Plan with your next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please provide the sight visibility triangle for the intersection of Balboa and Blacklidge, measuring the 20' stem on Balboa and using the near side measurement of 180' for Blacklidge. 2. Please note that the sidewalk for right-of-way (ROW) sidewalks is a minimum 5'. Please revise the width of the ROW sidewalk on Blacklidge to 5'. 3. With regards to the above comment, please change the dimension of the sidewalk on Detail 2, Sheet 3 to 5'. 4. Please provide the Docket and Page of the Drainage Easement noted as the outlet drain for Basin No. 2. 5. Please call out the areas to be used for water harvesting on the Site Plan, either by Keynote or labeled as such. 6. Please clarify the purpose of the arrow pointing out towards Balboa with the Keynote No. 6, which calls out a 20' fire lane driveway - no exit. Grading Plan: 1. Please provide the general dimensions of the basins. 2. It appears there is a 6" curb on the eastside of Basin No. 2, blocking the drainage from reaching the basin. Please clarify and/or label as needed. Drainage Report: 1. Please revise the calculations for the determination of the 5-year threshold retention requirements using the 5-year weighted runoff coefficients rather than the 100-year coefficients. 2. Please revise the volume calculations of the basins to ensure retention of the 5-year volumetric difference between pre- and post-development. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Thank you, Suzanne Bohnet, CFM Engineering Associate (520) 791-5550 x1188 office Suzanne.Bohnet@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/14/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Grading notes for permits plus. With SITE PLAN 11/14/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 11/22/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/01/2006 | FSANCHE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |