Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU02595
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Dodge T06BU02595 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 17, 2007 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu02595.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/24/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 06/12/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 12, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06BU02595 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Dodge PROJECT ADDRESS: 4220 E 22nd Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SWPPP APPROVED DRAINAGE REPORT 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Keynote 24 indicts sidewalk scuppers at the front PAAL entrance/exit on the grading plan. The site plan does not indicate sidewalk scuppers in this location. Be advised the site plan must have the same information that is shown on the grading plan. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS 1. Provide a soils report that reflects the design of the project. The site plan has not been updated. Also provide a response letter that indicates exactly where the revisions can be found, provide the page number, section type and paragraph number. DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6. 2. Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to existing constructed channel. The above comment is from the first review and appears to not have been addressed. It is acknowledged the proposed building closest to the wash has been eliminated. However the potential of future development of a structure is high. That said the recommended building setback from the existing channel is required. 3. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. The above comment is from the first review and appears to not have been addressed. Provide the requested information. 4. The soils report shall provide recommendations for asphalt design and thickness. The above comment is from the first review and appears to not have been addressed. Provide the requested information SWPPP COMMENTS 1. Once the grading plan is close to approval submit 3 copies of the SWPPP and grading plan. 2. Add a general note to the SWPPP site map and narrative; Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 3. The Owner and Operator (1) certification statement needs to be signed prior to approval of the SWPPP. This assures the City of Tucson prior to issuance of a grading permit that there is a designated responsible party for the SWPPP. 4. The operator responsible for day to day activities (the contractor) and the operator with control over plans and specifications (owner/engineer) is required to submit an NOI to the state and a copy to the City of Tucson. Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and a copy to the City of Tucson. Submit two copies of the NOIs filled out and signed by the appropriate parties. (Part IV.F) 5. Please refer to the enclosed green document "AZPDES - Posting Requirements". This must be post at the construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. Be advised this document must be completely filled out upon the time of the pre-construction meeting. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2007 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/25/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |