Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU02595
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Dodge T06BU02595 Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2006 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu02595.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents |
| 11/17/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 12/11/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Grading Plan can not be approved prior to Site Plan approval. |
| 12/11/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 14, 2006 SUBJECT: 4220 E 22nd Street- Engineering review of site plan and grading plan TO: ADG Attn: Hilary Meehan LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec22, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM05677 (site plan) and T06BU02595 (grading plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T06CM05677), grading plan (T06BU02595), and drainage report (prepared by DCC, dated 10-27-06), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Revise Sheet T.1 to replace all red lettering from the title sheet with black lettering to insure site plan clarity for reproduction and microfiche purposes. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map on Sheet T.1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as watercourses and subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label the dimensions for the proposed back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located at the new car delivery area that is shown on the proposed site plan. The spur must have a minimum of a 3-foot radii and 3 feet in depth, but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide a back-up spur at the end of each PAAL located at the proposed screen wall located on the northeast corner of the office building. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for requirements. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide wheel stop barriers for all parking stalls located adjacent to the pedestrian circulation areas. Wheel stop barriers are required at these locations to prevent parked vehicles from extending into the unobstructed 4-foot pedestrian circulation area. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide dimensions for all 2-way PAALs shown on the site plan. Verify that PAALs have a minimum 24-foot wide access area where gates are proposed and for parking stalls located across from proposed buildings. 7) DS Sec.2-02.A.8: Revise the site plan to show the minimum unobstructed radius of 18' that is required at all PAAL intersection that are being used as access for refuse collection and fire lanes. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b for PAAL requirements. Specifically for the PAAL adjacent to the Truck Display. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the existing and future sight visibility triangles for all intersections of the PAALs at Columbus Boulevard and 22nd Street. Label if existing right-of-way is greater than or equal to the future right-of-way. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.5.1 for sight visibility requirements and dimensions. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Provide both SVT triangles, labeled and dimensioned, for the intersection of Columbus Boulevard and 22nd Street. SVT's are only applicable for the subject property. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise Key Note #3 to call out the 25-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at all of the driveway entrances located on 22nd Street and Columbus Boulevard. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise Key Note #5 on the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Columbus Boulevard. Revise dimensions on site plan to show the 6-foot width. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. 12) DS Sec2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise key Note #14 on the site plan to reference detail T-102 or call out truncated domes in the key note. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required striped pedestrian circulation path (crosswalk) that is required from the New Sales Building to the pedestrian circulation path located along Columbus Boulevard. 14) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the pedestrian circulation located on the east side of the proposed office building that connects the building to the adjacent pedestrian circulation along Columbus. Crosswalks can not cross behind parking stalls or be located as to impede the safety of pedestrians. 15) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required pedestrian circulation paths between all proposed buildings. The pedestrian circulation paths must be provided around the entire proposed structure or clarify adequate pedestrian refuge areas to all public use areas. Pedestrian circulation must be 5-feet in width were adjacent to a PAAL and a structure. 16) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.14: Label and show on the site plan the maneuvering area for all loading zones required on the site plan. Refer to AASHTO for the national standards for turning radii. 17) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide roof drainage arrows and locations of all concentration points. Specifically show down spout locations at pedestrian circulation areas. A detail for the dimension of the proposed scuppers that are used for collecting onsite roof drainage at all pedestrian sidewalk is required. Any scuppers proposed under the sidewalk will be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 18) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Provide the finish floor elevation (FFE) on the site plan for all proposed buildings. The finish floor elevations must be greater than or equal to the FFE elevations in the proposed drainage report and the elevation called out on the proposed grading plan must match the site plan. 19) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan to show the entire floodplain width for Naylor Wash located along the south side of the subject property. 20) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.18: Revise the site plan to call out 22nd Street and Columbus Boulevard as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). Provide a note stating that the site plan is in conformance with the MS&R overlay zone criteria. 21) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label the existing and future right-of-way widths for all MS&R streets. If the existing right-of-way is built out to the required future right-of-way label the site plan to clarify. 22) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Provide the recordation information for 22nd Street and Columbus Boulevard along with the right-of-way widths shown. 23) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Revise the site plan to label and show the intersection widening for both sides of Columbus Boulevard and 22nd Street intersection. Refer to the MS&R Plan for intersection widening requirements (http://www.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/regional/msr). 24) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.20: Provide on the site plan all easements for the existing and proposed utilities (water, gas, electric) and public/private sewer lines. The easements must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 25) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.21: Provide on the site plan the dimensions from the street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines. 26) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise the site plan to relocate the trash container enclosure outside of the existing electrical easements. 27) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Revise Detail A5 on Sheet C1.2 to provide for the required bollards along the sides of the enclosure. The enclosure must meet the minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the bollards that are required between the containers and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 28) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.C: Revise the landscape plan to match the revised site plan. Verify that the SVTs on the landscape plan match the site plan. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval. 29) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Provide a geotechnical report evaluation to discuss the feasibility of the project. Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to existing constructed channel. The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. 30) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Provide typical lot grading details, show minimum side and rear setbacks. Provide detailed cross sections for each perimeter, fully labeled and dimensioned. 31) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Provide spot elevations at all curb openings that are being used for site runoff to assure drainage of onsite flows into landscape areas or the Naylor Wash. 32) DS Sec.11-01.8.1.A: Clarify on Sheet 3 of 4 of the grading plan the spot elevation located on the south side of the proposed Paint and Body Shop. Elevation shown is finished surface adjacent to the pedestrian circulation, which is 0.04-foot higher than the finished floor elevation of the proposed building. Verify that differential grading has been addressed for the southern portion of the subject property per the requirements within this section. 33) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide details for all back-up spurs located at the end of PAALs. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for requirements. 34) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide wheel stop barrier locations and a detail for all parking stalls located adjacent to the pedestrian circulation areas. Wheel stop barriers are required at these locations to prevent parked vehicles from extending into the unobstructed 4-foot pedestrian circulation area. 35) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide locations of existing storm drains located along 22nd Street. Verify in the drainage report that the 41cfs of onsite flow out of the PAAL is contained within the roadway section of 22nd Street. Provide spot elevations along 22nd Street to assure drainage into the storm drains. 36) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension all scuppers that are used for collecting roof drainage and discharges at the pedestrian sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk must be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. 37) Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. DRAINAGE REPORT: 38) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.3.B.3: Provide a table within the text of the report that summarizes the watershed characteristics and flood peaks for both pre-developed and post-developed conditions. 39) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide location of storm drains located on 22nd ST. Clarify that WS9 (41.8 cfs) can be contained within the right-of-way of 22nd St and that the existing storm drains are properly sized. Provide spot elevations on grading plan to show drainage patterns off-site. 40) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revised grading plan must show roof drainage and location of all concentration points. If downspout locations cross pedestrian circulation areas provide calculations and detail for scupper sizing to show that the 10-year flow is contained under the sidewalk. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 41) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report Evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to existing constructed channel. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) The soils report shall provide recommendations for asphalt design and thickness. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 42) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required at resubmittal of the grading plan. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan, revised drainage report, geotechnical report and a SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/14/2006 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/14/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |