Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T06BU02417
Parcel: 13101071E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: GRADING

Permit Number - T06BU02417
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/10/2006 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: VantageWest Credit Union
T06BU02417
Grading Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 12, 2006

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.org or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.

C:\planning\grading\t06bu02417.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents
10/19/2006 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Site plan approval is necessary to continue review.
11/30/2006 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 1, 2006
SUBJECT: 2222 S Craycroft Rd- Engineering Review of site plan and grading plan
TO: Fast Permits
LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec23, Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T06CM05276 (site plan) and T06BU02417 (grading plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan (T06CM05276), grading plan (T06BU02417), drainage report (prepared by CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc.), geotechnical report addendum (prepared by Western Technologies, Inc), and Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map on Sheet T1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as watercourses and subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.5: Provide the basis of bearing used to establish dimensions and bearings of property lines and property corners. The basis of bearing should be established from 2 found, physically monumented points described and shown on the site plan.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located on the north-west side of the existing building and proposed vehicular use area on the proposed site plan. The spur must have a minimum of a 3-foot radii and 3 feet in depth, but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide wheel stop barriers for the 2 parking stalls located adjacent to the back-up spurs. Wheel stop barriers are required at this location to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging landscape areas, or walls. Detail 7/C5 shows a concrete header with no extruded concrete curb due to the inlet for the water harvesting area.

5) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.8: Provide post barricades or other form of separation for the 2 parking spaces adjacent to the back-up spur to prevent encroachment into the landscape area along the west side.

6) DS Sec.2-01 Revise the site plan to show the minimum unobstructed radius of 18' that is required at all PAAL intersection that are being used as access for refuse collection and fire lanes. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.1.3.b for PAAL requirements.

7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify and label the 25-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at all of the driveway entrances located on Craycroft Road. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards.

8) TAMG Sec.5.4.1: Revise the site plan to show that all entrance and exits drives crossing Craycroft Road are limited to two per three hundred feet of frontage and that the nearest pavement edges are spaced a minimum of eighty feet apart.

9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Clarify Detail 2/C5 on Sheet C5 to show that the handicap access ramps at all pedestrian circulation locations have truncated domes per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. Provide a note on the detail to refer to General Note #11 or state that truncated domes are required.

10) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along the street frontage of Craycroft Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks.

11) DS Sec.2-01.2.1.A.20: Provide on the site plan all easements for the proposed utilities. The easements must be shown graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference.

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS:

12) DS Sec.11-01: Provide general grading notes, including a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements).

13) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Provide the percent slope in the bottom of both water harvesting areas that are to be achieved by grading.

14) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C: Provide typical lot grading details, show minimum side and rear setbacks. Provide detailed cross sections for each perimeter, fully labeled and dimensioned.

15) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the grading plan and site plan to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, water harvesting areas, and associated erosion protection. The grading plan and site plan show that the tops of fill slopes for the water harvesting basins encroaches within the required 2-feet setback. Provide sufficient room for both water harvesting areas to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of fill slopes and wall footings.

16) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a detail for the location and type of drainage structure, label and dimension all scuppers that are used for collecting roof drainage and discharges at the pedestrian sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk must be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. Provide a drainage statement showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk.

17) Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval.

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

18) CGP Part IV.C.3.c: Provide wattles along both curb openings at the inlet to the water harvesting areas to prevent pollutants and excess sediment from entering the water harvesting areas.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan and a revised SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference.

If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/04/2006 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed