Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU02309
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: T and T Engineering, L.L.C. DATE: October 26, 2006 5980 E. Verde Place Tucson, Arizona 85750 SUBJECT: D I R E C TV, 9608 E. Old Vail Rd. Grading Plan T06BU02309 (Third Review) T15S, R15E, Section 26 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report The Grading Plan (GP), Drainage Report (DR) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. General note number 34 conflicts with section "G" on sheet 4. Provide a geotechnical engineering soils report for the 2:1 hand placed rip-rap at the basins overflow or change the slope to 3:1. Per previous comment. 3. Detention/Retention: · Must match drainage report. There are still numerous discrepancies and/or omissions between the DR and the GP. Revise as required. · Provide a geotechnical engineering soils report for the 2:1 hand placed rip-rap at the basins overflow or change the slope to 3:1. Per previous comment. Drainage report: 1. DR comments are directed to: Huitt-Zollars, Inc. 426 N. 44th St., Ste. 300 Phoenix, Arizona, 85008 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 3. The DR shall be stamped by a registered civil engineer. This is a state law with the Arizona Technical Board of Registrants and cannot be waived. Without the registrants stamp and signature the DR has no validity and will not be accepted or reviewed again without the registrants stamp. Per previous comment. 4. There are still numerous discrepancies and/or omissions between the DR and the GP. Revise as required. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: 1. The SWPPP has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9608 E. Old Vail Rd. Grad3 |
| 10/27/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 10/27/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
| 10/30/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved development plan. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/03/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | REJECT SHELF | Completed |