Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU02309
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/16/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved development plan. 2. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off |
| 10/20/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | October 20, 2006 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician T06BU02309 Grading Plans for D06-0021 Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. In addition, we could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan for Zoning Review. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped Development Plan/Site Plan, Landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. Please be aware that the Development Plan (which has been approved) must also go through the Site Plan process. This is a walk through process in which the stamped approved Development Plan is also approved as a Site Plan. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. Please see previous comments by David Rivera. |
| 10/24/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | see comments on workflow started 10/25/06 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2006 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |