Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: POOL:COMM-MODEL
Permit Number - T06BU02252
Review Name: POOL:COMM-MODEL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. 2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 3. Provide construction documents drawn to scale and with sufficient detail and clarity to demonstrate that the work complies with the applicable plumbing codes, ANSI/NSPI-1 2003, and with ANSI/NSPI-2 2003. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 4. If the utilities (e.g. water, natural gas, and sewer) are provided by others under separate permits, provide reference drawings to show the locations and capacities of the utilities. |
| 09/28/2006 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. 2. Provide construction documents drawn to scale and with sufficient detail and clarity to demonstrate that the work complies with the applicable codes. Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 3. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. |
| 10/19/2006 | LINDA BUCZYNSKI | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide full electrical design for all pool and spa equipment, and any additional lighting, sealed by an Arizona Registrant. 2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 1/8-inch (all upper case). Reference Section 302.3, Uniform Administrative Code, 1997. 3. Provide construction documents drawn to scale and with sufficient detail and clarity to demonstrate that the work complies with the NEC, IECC, and Tucson Lighting Code. |
| 10/20/2006 | LINHART PETERSEN POERS ASSOC. | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1)Provide Enginneered Structural Plans/Calculations. 2)No structural review could be performed as no structural plans or calculations were provided |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2006 | BETH GRANT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/16/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |