Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU02039
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plans including, landscape, and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
| 09/15/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 18, 2006 To: Bruce Wilson EEC 4625 E Ft. Lowell Rd Tucson, Arizona 85712 FROM: Jose E. Ortiz, PE Engineering Division SUBJECT: Callecita Villas Condominiums Grading Plan T06BU02039 (First Review) T13S, R113E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. List subdivision or Development number, and if a DSMR was required list the DSMR number. 3. Provide additional spot grades in the eastern water harvesting landscape area to ensure positive drainage away from the proposed and existing structures. 4. Illustrate the grade break/high point in the private entrance off of Limberlost Drive. 5. Per PCDOT Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual "Security barriers must be provided at the top of all basin side slopes steeper the 4:1 where water depths exceed 2 feet." Stone Wash serves as a basin therefore a physical barrier shall be required along the entire length of the western property line at the top of bank. 6. Place a note on sheet 1 that states "A copy of these approved plans must be on the job site whenever construction is in progress." 7. If applicable, show Phase numbers and delineate. Each phase must function independent of future phases. 8. Show gradeable area and illustrate the limits of grading. 9. Keynotes 2 and 3 (SVT info) is not needed on the grading plan, but if chosen they can remain on the grading plan. If left on please illustrate the actual SVT line-work in the plan view 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. Call out/Illustrate peak discharges entering and exiting the site. Drainage report: The Drainage report does not appear to be the latest revised report. Please submit the latest report with the next submittal. Ensure that the following comments have been address with the report. 1. Address the maintenance responsibility for all drainage facilities (including retention basins) in the Drainage Report and provide a maintenance checklist. We also recommend including a copy of the check list in the CC & R's to allow the Home Owners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 2. Due to the fact that Stone Wash has the capacity to handle additional storm water and the close proximity of the site in respect to Rillito River is there a possibility of routing some of the on-site flows to Stone Wash to minimize the size of the retention basin? SWPPP Patricia Gilbert of DSD Engineering will provide SWPPP comments. Should you have questions regarding the SWPPP please feel free to contact Patricia (791-5550, Patricia.Gilbert@tucsonaz.gov) or myself. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x 305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov Jose E. Ortiz, PE Civil Engineer City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-4259 x 305 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 09/15/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 28, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06BU02039 PROJECT NAME: Callecita Villas Condominiums PROJECT ADDRESS: 209 East Limberlost Drive PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert, Engineering Associate The following items must be revised or added to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. 1. Include the site address on the cover sheet of the SWPPP. 2. Include page numbers with the Table of Content of each subject item. 3. In the narrative add the following verbiage in a general note; Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 4. Provide signatures for the Owner/Operator Pollution Prevention Plan Certification (page 13) on all SWPPPs (narrative and site map). 5. Two copies of the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit have been submitted with the SWPPP. One copy is required to be with the SWPPP. Remove one copy of the AzPDES General Permit in each SWPPP. 6. Provide a detail on sheet 2 of the SWPPP site map of a concrete washout and chemical storage area 7. Be advised site fencing is required in areas where drainage is directed (low elevations). It is an unnecessary cost to the owner to provide silt fencing on the entire perimeter of the site. It is recommended to only provide silting fencing in areas of lower elevation. 8. In addition to the above comment, the contours on the SWPPP do not match the contours on the grading plan. Revise the SWPPP accordingly. The contours on the SWPPP and grading plan must match. |
| 09/19/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 09/19/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. Please clarify if this project is a condominium or apartment development. Per the title block this project is referenced as a condominium. If this project is in for review as an apartment complex revise the title block accordingly |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2006 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/03/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |