Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU01650
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: FRY'S GAS STATION ADDITION - 7770 E. Speedway Blvd. T06CM03790 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 16, 2006 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu01650-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents |
| 11/22/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 12/21/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Tait and Associates DATE: December 29, 2006 Architects Mesa, Arizona 85202 SUBJECT: 7770 E. Speedway Blvd. Site plan T06CM003790, Grading plan T06BU01650 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan, Grading Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP), Grading Plan (GP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan, Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. A detailed response letter is required, "See site plan" is too vague. 2. The SP and GP cannot be approved prior to the site plan (T06CM03381) that is currently under review. 3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. Call out a COT standard detail or show a detail of the H/C ramp on the plans. 4. There shall be no obstructions in the SVT this includes any parking spaces per D.S. 3-01.5.0. 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. Per previous comment. 6. Edit general note no. 29 to "All work shall conform to City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 Excavation and Grading". 7. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Call out the Bench Mark on the plans. 8. Show Site plan (T06CM03790) and Grading plan (T06BU01650) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. Per previous comment. 9. Show on the plans where the water harvesting techniques will be utilized with drainage arrows, grades and depressed curbs. 10. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Per previous comment. 11. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Per previous comment. 12. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Per previous comment. 13. Submit 4 copies of the grading plan upon re-submittal. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been conditionally accepted. 2. Generate drainage exhibits into the DS with pockets that show where and how the water harvesting techniques will be utilized. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7770 E. Speedway Blvd. Site&Grad 2 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/08/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |