Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU01647
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 10/03/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: TUCSON ROLLING SHUTTERS - MANUFACTING BUILDING 2660 E. Bilby T06BU01647 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 3, 2006 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu01647-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/25/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 25, 2006 SUBJECT: 2660 E Bilby Road- 2nd Engineering Review of site plan and grading plan TO: Metro Permits Express LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec08, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM03784 (site plan) and T06BU01647 (grading plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the re-submitted site plan (T06CM03784), grading plan (T06BU01647), drainage report (prepared by CMG Drainage Engineering, Inc.), geotechnical engineering report, and Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN and GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: DS Sec.3-05.2.2.B.1: Provide a detail on both the site plan and grading plan for the required 5-foot wide setback for the pedestrian refuge area that must be maintained between the enclosed building and the proposed PAAL. The sidewalk must be a minimum 4-foot wide with a 1-foot setback from the proposed PAAL. DS Sec.2-02.2.1.12: Clarify on the grading plan and site plan the handicap access ramps proposed for the pedestrian circulation. Add a note referencing a standard detail used for the handicap access ramp at the transition from pedestrian circulation to vehicular use area. GENERAL COMMENTS: The submitted SWPPP sets are approvable, but must be re-submitted with the revised site plan and grading plan for stamped approval. Please provide a revised site plan and revised grading plan that address the comments provided above. Due to the comments generated the site plan and grading plan may be submitted to me for over the counter review and approval, as long as all of the items have been addressed. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |