Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU01617
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 14, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06BU01617 PROJECT NAME: Center for Neurosciences PROJECT ADDRESS: 2450 East River Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: FOUR COPIES OF THE GRADING PLAN AND SWPPP APPROVED: SWPPP SWPPP will be signed and stamped with approval once the grading plan is approved. 1. A copy of the stamped approved Development Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. Be aware that the Zoning, Engineering, Landscape and Fire Review Sections must walk through the CDRC stamped approved Development Plan for Site Plan approval. 2. On all cross sections on sheet C1.3A provide the height of all the walls. 3. Indicate the sizing of the decomposed granite adjacent to the catch basins (keynote 11). Erosion and sediment transport should be minimized from entering the storm drain system. Where applicable it is recommended to use a larger size rock around the perimeter of each catch basin in effort to minimize sediment and particles of decomposed granite from entering the storm drain system. Revise appropriately. The above comment is from the first review and has not been adequately addressed. The landscape clearly shows on the plan view decomposed granite is within the area between the building and sidewalk, where 7 catch basins are proposed. Demonstrate on the plan view that deposition of decomposed granite will not enter the storm drain system. 4.Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. |
| 12/15/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate on grading plan how all landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. 2. Submit a copy of the approved development plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved development plan. 3. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning and Landscape. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
| 12/18/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: T06BU01617grad Grading for D05-0038 2450 East River Road TRANSMITTAL: December 18, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Please provide a copy of the stamped approved site plan that is bases upon the stamped approved development plan. NPPO and Engineering approval is required prior to approval from Zoning. Please see the previous comments by David Rivera below: 07/21/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/02/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |