Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU01610
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/2006 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD Engineering Review Comments for T06BU01610 The grading plan has been reviewed and is not recommended for approval. The following comments are offered: Sheet 1: 1. Fill in recording information for 32' slope easement on Section B. 2. Fill in recording information for 32' slope easement on Detail H. 3. Fill in recording information for 32' slope easement on Detail J. 4. Dimension riprap apron on Detail J. 5. Create a low point in the detention basin (Detail J) to which the entire basin will drain. 6. Install a low-flow bleed pipe of 6" diameter or less (or a larger pipe with a similarly-sized orifice) at the invert of the detention/retention basin (Detail J) unless the soils report is revised to include basin percolation results. 7. Revise the administrative address to 6984 E Century Park Dr. Sheet 2: 1. Fill in recording information for 32' slope easement near callouts for Sections B and H. 2. Fill in recording information for ingress-egress easement. 3. Provide pavement width or cross-section for drive from ingress-egress to southern side of building. 4. Provide pavement width or cross-section for drive west of building. 5. Provide horizontal control or dimensioning for all work. There is a scarcity of horizontal dimensioning for paving, grading, and rail spurs. |
| 07/03/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plan if/as necessary to match the approved development plan set. Submit a copy of the approved development plan, landscape and native plant preservation plans. |
| 07/07/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/07/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments for T06CM01610: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2006 | ADRIANNE OLIVO | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/18/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |