Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU01113
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved development plans including the landscape and native plant preservation plan for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance with the approved documents and applicable codes and standards only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
| 06/01/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Jeffrey A. Stanley DATE: June 2, 2006 Stanley Engineering and Drainage P.O. Box 1888 Tucson, Arizona 85702 SUBJECT: 7855 E Speedway Blvd., Automotive Service Ctr. Grading Plan T06BU001113 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 05 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan. The Grading Plan (GP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting". The note with the asterisk on sheet 2 (by the key notes) does not correspond with general note 18. Revise as required. 3. Show cross section with transverse and longitudinal slopes. A cross-section of the P.A.A.L. 4. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. 5. Show details of all surface materials (achieved by the x-section). 6. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 7. Show the 100-year flood peak discharge. 8. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabbions or vegetation) 9. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 10. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. The entire site is excessively high. Explain why so much fill is needed to develop the site. 11. Show grade break at the entrance if applicable. 12. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme. 13. Call out peak discharges entering and exiting the site. 14. Submit 4 sets of the Grading plan upon re-submittal. Drainage report: 1. The DR has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:\7855 E Speedway Blvd. Grad |
| 06/11/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 06/11/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. 4. A site card with DSD approvals by Fire, Zoning, Handi-cap, Engineering, and Landscape/NPPO including the approved development plan stamped for site plan approval and signatures is required before the grading plan can be approved by Zoning. Two copies of the approved development plan, landscape and NPPO plans are to be submitted with the grading plans packet for processing and approval as a site plan. No fees are involved in re-stamping the development/tentative plat plans as an approved site plan. The development plan may be walked through for stamps and site card sign off. Submit the following: two copies of the stamped development plan, landscape and NPPO plans must be included with the grading plans packet processed together for site approval. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2006 | AMERY KLAPPERT | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/12/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |