Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU00947
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 11, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: T06BU00947 PROJECT NAME: Los Reales Branch PROJECT ADDRESS: 369-371 West Valencia Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Patricia Gilbert The following items must be revised or added to the grading plan. Please include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GRADING PLAN, SWPPP, DRAINAGE REPORT For Drainage Report comments please refer to the site plan comments, activity number T05CM06116. 1. A copy of the stamped approved Site Plan must be included with the Grading Plan submittal. 2. The Site Plan is currently in review. Any changes made to the Site Plan must be reflected on the Grading Plan. The Site Plan and Grading Plan must match. 3. Provide a note on the grading plan stating, "This property is affected by the 100 year regulatory floodplain and is subject to floodplain requirements." DS 2-02.2.1.A.15. 4. Show on the grading plan the west boundary of the proposed floodplain delineation. DS 11-01.4.C.3. 5. Provide a note on the grading plan that the improvements to the alley must be complete prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, as stated in drainage report to elevate drainage issues. 6. The discharge capacity of the onsite storm drain system is approximately 5-6 cfs. The basin discharges 45.2 cfs, clarify on the grading plan where the remaining 40 cfs from the outlet of the basin is directed. 7. Perimeter wall must have adequate flow-through wall openings for accepting and releasing drainage without elevating or ponding water on the upstream side of the development and so as to not concentrate or increase flow on the downstream side. To meet this requirement show wall openings for the required perimeter wall on the plan. Provide a detail on the plan of the wall openings, give dimensions. SMDDFM 12.5 The above comment is from the first review. There is still concern that ponding will occur on the east side of the east perimeter wall from the off site flow (46.2 cfs). It must be clear on the grading plan. Please refer to site plan comment 7 and drainage report comment 5. Revise the grading plan appropriately if revisions are made to the site plan. 8. Indicate building roof slope, downspouts and sidewalk scuppers. Graphically indicate downspouts and sidewalk scuppers. Add note, "All roof spouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-02.2.1.A.16 The above comment is from the first review and has not been adequately addressed. This office acknowledges the site plan (sheet SD 1) shows the location of scuppers adjacent to the existing building. The grading plan must also provide the locations of the scuppers. The grading plan is the construction document the Engineering inspectors use to verify if the development has been built correctly. Provide the location of the scuppers adjacent the existing and proposed building on the grading plan. Additionally, show the direction of drainage on the roof, this information has not been provided. SWPPP COMMENTS 1. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for this project does not meet the minimum requirements of the ADEQ Construction General Permit. ADEQ provides a checklist for SWPPP preparation. The SWPPP checklist can be obtained from the ADEQ website at: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cswppp.pdf. Include a completed SWPPP checklist with the SWPPP. In the checklist clearly describe the location within the SWPPP for each required element. Below are some SWPPP general comments that will need to be addressed prior to SWPPP approval. 2. Please refer to the enclosed green document "AZPDES - Posting Requirements". This must be post at the construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. Be advised this document must be completely filled out upon the time of the pre-construction meeting. 3. The certification statement needs to be signed prior to approval of the SWPPP. This assures the City of Tucson prior to issuance of a grading permit that there is a designated responsible party for the SWPPP. 4. Include a copy of the AzPDES permit provided by ADEQ. A copy of the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit must accompany the SWPPP. Include a copy of the general permit with the SWPPP. (Part IV.F) 5. Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and a copy to the City of Tucson. Provide copies of the NOIs in the narrative. (Part IV.F) |
| 12/14/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Landscape plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/25/2007 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/25/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |