Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU00854
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | The grading plan cannot be approved until the Engineering divisions comments and concerns have all been addressed and approval granted, review will continue upon re-su |
| 06/27/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Sierra Morado Unit 2, Phase II Grading Plan, T06BU00854 Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/30/2006 The Grading Plan can not be approved at this time. We offer the following comments: GRADING PLAN: 1. The Detail W/9 data table does not appear to include all the applicable channels (e.g. see Sheet 2 of 10). Revise as necessary. 2. Show the proper curb returns and sidewalk connection at the Drexel Road and Copper Hills Dr intersection. 3. Detail H/8 is lacking dimensions. Revise. 4. The proposed cul de sac at the end of Bilby Road is not entirely within the existing and dedicated right of way. It is not clear under what plans the cul de sac will be constructed and how it will be maintained in the future. Unless the cul de sac is temporary, it should be completely dedicated as public right of way. Add a keynote as to the status of the cul de sac. 5. Provide a detailed response letter with the next submittal that explains how the comments were addressed and references the exact locations/sheets where the revisions were made. |
| 07/06/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 07/06/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. 4. Clarify if the grading is to be phased for the Sierra Morado Unit 2. If so the tentative plat drawing must be revised with the phase lines delineated and is it to be re-reviewd and stamped by Patricia Gehlen. 5. The five foot wide pedestrian walkway along the eastern and western boundaries of the property (in this phase) have not been depicted on the grading plan. Please clarify if this has to do with the phasing of the grading plan. If not please ensure that the extents of the walkways associated with this phase is depicted and labeled on the grading plan. 6. Some changes to channels have been made on the grading plan but are not shown on the tentative plat. Please clarify if the tentative plat has been revised to reflect these changes. 7. Please ensure that the grading plan matches the approved tentative plat or the tentative plat must be revised to match the grading plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2006 | ADRIANNE OLIVO | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/07/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |