Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU00746
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/22/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 03/22/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 03/26/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site plan including landscape and native plant preservation plans for reference. The grading application will be reviewed for compliance only when the approved documents are included in the submittal. Revise grading plans as necessary to comply with the approved site plan. |
| 04/30/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 2, 2007 SUBJECT: Dory's Apartments TO: Guillermo Andrade LOCATION: 407 W Utah, T15S R13E Sec01, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM01695 & T06CM01696 (Site Plans) and T06BU00746 (Grading Plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the site plan grading plan, Drainage Report (prepared by Indevco A & Es, Inc., dated 2/20/2007), and the Geotechnical Engineering Report with addendum (prepared by Terracon, project # 63055280) and does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) Revise the site plan and grading plan so that all elements of the proposed development are completely contained within the boundary of the subject parcel. It is clear based on the submitted survey and proposed site plan that a portion of the development specifically the southeast portion is encroaching onto the adjacent parcel to the east. Revise the back-up spur dimensions to prevent encroachment onto the adjacent property. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan and grading plan to show the required 20-foot minimum curb cut width at the driveway location. Refer to Traffic Engineering for acceptable redesign that will minimize the curb cut width at this location. Any modification to the Development Standards will require a DSMR application. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Verify on the site plan the required 12-foot separation from the proposed driveway to any adjacent driveways on the neighbors parcel. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11 & TAMG Sec.5.5: Depict and label 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the proposed driveway entrance along Utah Street. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan and grading plan to clearly show that the proposed 18-foot curb returns at the driveway entrance are constructed only on the subject property. No improvements are allowed off-site without a construction easement and written approval from adjacent property owners. 6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the Type-2 Access Ramp detail in Detail 2 on Sheet A0.0. The truncated domes are to be located in a 2-foot width along the transition of the pedestrian circulation and vehicular use area. Refer to 'Redlines' for clarification. 7) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.15: Provide a detail with dimensions on the site plan or grading plan for the proposed retention basin showing slope, depth, high water line and setback form trash enclosure. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and grading plan to show that the finish floor elevation for Building 1 is elevated 1-foot above the calculated high water line (HWL) of the retention basin. Refer to DS Sec10-02.14.2.4. 9) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and grading plan to show the bottom of the refuse enclosure elevated above the HWL of the retention basin. Positive drainage from the refuse enclosure is required. 10) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the refuse enclosure so that it is not part of the retention basin side slope. Provide fill adjacent to the enclosure to prevent standing water against the wall. 11) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.19: Clarify on the site plan the existing right-of-way width. Label and provide the recordation information on Sheet A0.0 for the r-o-w of Utah Street. 12) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.23: Provide additional spot elevations, on either the site plan or grading plan, within the PAAL, corner of buildings, retention basin inlet, weir outlets and refuse enclosure to verify slope and drainage patterns. 13) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.32: Provide an approved DSMR for the location of the proposed refuse location. It is acknowledge that the location has been accepted by Environmental Services, however the proposed location does not meet access or Traffic Engineering requirements. A meeting is required with DSD Engineering and Traffic Engineering, Jose Ortiz, to discuss relocating the refuse enclosure to the west to prevent vehicles on-site from turning onto the public road without the proper sight visibility. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 14) Please ensure that the Grading Plan is consistent with the Site Plan and Drainage Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 15) Provide additional spot elevations, on either the site plan or grading plan, within the PAAL, corner of buildings, retention basin inlet, weir outlets and refuse enclosure to verify slope and drainage patterns. 16) Provide details for the proposed retention basin and all associated inlets and weir outlets. Verify that the site pan and grading plan design meet the requirements within the submitted engineering report. 17) Provide separate cross sections through the lot at different location to verify lot dimensions, PAAL widths, pedestrian circulation, basin location and water harvesting areas. 18) DS Sec10-02.14.2.4: Revise the site plan and grading plan to show the finish floor elevation for Building 1 elevated 1-foot above the calculated high water line (HWL) of the retention basin. 19) Revise the site plan and grading plan to show the bottom of the refuse enclosure elevated above the HWL of the retention basin. Positive drainage from the refuse enclosure is required. 20) Revise the refuse enclosure so that it is not part of the retention basin side slope. Provide fill adjacent to the enclosure to prevent standing water against the wall. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan and grading plan at resubmittal. Please include 'Redlines' with the resubmittal package. The revised site plan and grading plan must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/04/2007 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/04/2007 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |