Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU00572
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/23/2006 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Holiday Inn Express - 1564 W. Grant Road T06BU00572 Grading Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2006 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\grading\t06bu00572-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 11/06/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a copy of the approved site and landscape plans for reference. The grading plan will be reviewed when the approved documents are included in the submittal. |
| 11/27/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Grading Plan can not be approved until site plan comments have been addressed and approved. |
| 11/27/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 28, 2006 SUBJECT: 1564 W Grant Road- 2nd Engineering Review of site plan and grading plan TO: Metro Permits Express LOCATION: T13S R13E Sec34, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T06CM01697 (site plan) and T06BU00572 (grading plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised site plan (T06CM01697), grading plan, drainage report (prepared by Grenier Engineering, Inc.), geotechnical report addendum (prepared by Western Technologies, Inc), and Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A: Provide lettering and dimension that are equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The detail call outs have lettering that is less then twelve point. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.4: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as Section corners and subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located on the northern vehicular use area on the proposed site plan. The spur must have a minimum of a 3-foot radii and 3 feet in depth, but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height. 4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide the recordation information for the Reciprocal Easement for the shared Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL) in plan view on the site plan. 5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise the site plan showing the ingress/egress of both PAAL access points. Provide the minimum dimension of 24-feet for both PAAL intersections. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for all other vehicular use area design criteria. 6) DS Sec.3-05.2.1.B: Revise the site plan to provide for the required dimensions for all parking spaces. Within the vehicular use area located on the southeast corner and along the eastern property line the dimension shown for the distance from face of curb to the end of the parking space is 15'-0", the minimum distance required would be 15'-6" for an 18' total depth parking space. Provide a fully dimension parking layout and typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces along with access. 7) DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.2: Provide wheel stop barriers within all vehicular use areas to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscape areas, walls, or building; or overhanging adjacent sidewalks so as not to impede pedestrian circulation. 8) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Clarify locations for all handicap access ramps at the pedestrian circulation locations. Provide a note or a detail on the site plan stating that truncated domes are required at all access ramps per ANSI Standard A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. Handicapped ramps are to have full-length truncated domes where paving and concrete are flush. Please refer to this standard for additional curb access ramps requirements. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 9) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise cross-sections C, D and E on Sheet C-3 to properly label associated property lines. 10) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise Construction Keynote #22 and Detail 7 on Sheet C-4 on the grading plan to state that truncated domes are required at all access ramps per ANSI Standard A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. 11) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Revise Details C and E on Sheet C-3 and Details 2 and 5 on Sheet C-4 to state that all 3:1 (H:V) slopes will be re-vegetated or provide a keynote to state that all 3:1 (H:V) slopes will be re-vegetated per the geotechnical report. 12) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.6: Verify that Basin C and D (Water Harvesting Areas) met the recommended 10-foot setback from edge of building per the geotechnical report. 13) Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 14) CGP Part IV.C.3.c: Provide in the legend all symbols that are used on the SWPPP Exhibit. Specifically describe the symbol around the site that is designated with a line with 'x's' marked through it. 15) CGP Part IV.D.2.a: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit temporary control measures that will prevent the proposed channel from being exposed to the concrete, stucco, and paint washout area. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, a revised grading plan and a revised SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2006 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/11/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |