Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Permit Number - T06BU00512
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2007 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 04/13/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 4/13/07 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 05/03/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 7, 2007 SUBJECT: 2627 E Benson Hwy Site Plan and Grading Plan- 4th Engineering Review TO: Francisco H. Maldonado LOCATION: T15S R14E Sec05, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: T04CM04415 (site plan) and T06BU00512 (grading plan) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the resubmitted site plan (T04CM04415), grading plan (T06BU00512), drainage report (prepared by JE Fuller Hydrology and Geomorphology, Inc., dated June 9, 2006)), and Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP), for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan or grading plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Revise the site plan and grading plan to provide handicap access ramps at the transition of the 6-foot sidewalk, 25-foot curb returns and the pedestrian circulation that connects to the MS&R sidewalk. Provide a detail for the handicap access ramps with truncated domes per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. 2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.16: Revise the site plan and grading plan to remove the hatched area that represents the on-site ponding limits due to microfilming conflicts. Provide a different line weight, shown in the legend that will delineate the ponding limits within the water harvesting area and the on-site retention area. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.4: Provide a drainage statement/addendum showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk. The scuppers proposed under the sidewalk, Keynote #12, must be designed and constructed to convey the 10-year flood flow. The submitted Drainage Report did not discuss scupper calculations. 4) DS Sec.11-01: Revise the site plan and grading plan to provide handicap access ramps at the transition of the 6-foot sidewalk, 25-foot curb returns and the pedestrian circulation that connects to the MS&R sidewalk. Provide a detail for the handicap access ramps with truncated domes per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. 5) DS Sec.11-01: Revise the site plan and grading plan to remove the hatched area that represents the ponding limits on-site due to microfilming conflicts. Provide a different line weight, shown in the legend that will delineate the ponding limits within the water harvesting area and the on-site retention area. 6) Be advised that the grading plan can not be approved prior to site plan approval. All comments associated with the site plan must be corrected and the site plan must be approved prior to grading plan approval. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 7) CGP Part IV.C.3.b: Clarify on the SWPPP Exhibit, Sheet C-3 all areas of soil disturbance. Clarify areas that will not be disturbed or used for stockpiling by using a different line weight that must also be shown in the legend. 8) CGP Part IV.C.4: Identify on the SWPPP Exhibit the nearest receiving water(s), including ephemeral and intermittent streams or arroyos. The SWPPP Exhibit must clearly show the nearest receiving waters that would be effected by a spill on-site. 9) CGP Part IV.C.5: Provide on the SWPPP Exhibit, at the location of the concrete, paint and truck wash out area, the temporary SWPPP controls to prevent washout from entering the water harvesting area. 10) CGP Part IV.D.8.c: Revise the SWPPP Exhibit at the location of the chemical and material storage area the temporary SWPPP controls to prevent pollutants from entering the on-site retention area. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised site plan, grading plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan. Please enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package for reference. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |