Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - T06BU00512
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/23/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 23, 2006 SUBJECT: Site Plan, Drainage Report and Grading Plan Engineering Review for Construction Service LOCATION: 2627 E Benson Hy, T15S R14E Sec05, Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green and Elizabeth Eberbach, P.E. ACTIVITY: T05CM04415 & T06BU 00512 SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Subject items. Approvals are not recommended at this time. All items under the first review were not addressed on the second submittal. SITE PLAN: 1. Depict and label sight visibility triangles for Treat Ave. and Benson Highway. Include future sight triangles for Benson Hwy., based on the future curb location, per the City's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan (DS 2-02.2.1 A 10 & DS 3-01.5.B). 2. Provide a dimension for the Treat Ave. ingress/egress width (DS 2-02.2.1 A 11). The driveway exist at Treat Ave. must be 20' in width with a 18" radii headers at Treat Ave exit to comply with emergency vehicle access (DS 3-05.2.1 C). 3. Label each detention basin's 100-year water surface elevation and limits of ponding (DS 2-02.2.1 A 15). The Drainage Report and Site Plan show conflicting information on the number of basins and the location of the basins. Verify that the 6" water harvest area is large enough to accommodate the generated onsite runoff, and clarify with a statement in the Drainage Report. 4. Depict drainage patterns and finished grades (see Grading comments below for grading information). 5. Assure all easements are graphically shown on the plan with recording information provided (DS 2-02.2.1 A 20). 6. Depict and label 25' radii concrete headers per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the Benson Highway driveway entrance, and 18' radii headers at the Treat Ave. entrance. The headers should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the plan (DS 2-02.2.1 A 21, 3-01.3.2 C & 3-05.2.1 C 3 a). 8. The curb and 6' sidewalk must be shown and labeled on the Site Plan along the right of way of Benson Hwy. 9. Depict scuppers where any site drainage may be concentrated, for conveyance of 10-year flows (min.) under sidewalk areas, if applicable (DS 2-08.5.1 E & DS 3-01.4.4 F). Show the low points were storm water runoff enters the water harvest area. 10. Provide a note on the site plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities" (DS 10-02.0, Section 14.3.2). GRADING PLAN: Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the site plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 1. Provide general grading notes, including a grading/drainage note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements). 2. Provide existing and proposed elevations, a basis of elevation with benchmark based on, and referencing City Field Book and Page (DS 2-02.2.1 A 16 & 23). 3. Provide detailed cross sections for each perimeter, fully labeled and dimensioned. 4. Depict basin and associated inlet/outlet weir details, and any associated erosion protection, fully labeled and dimensioned. Please provide 3 copies of the revised grading plan, 2 copies of the revised site plan, 1 copy of the revised drainage report, and 4 copies of the Storm Water Prevention Plan (SWPP). The revised site plan, the revised grading plan, and the revised Drainage Report must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail where necessary, responses to all of the comments. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/24/2006 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is necessary to continue review. |
| 04/22/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 04/22/06 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section David Rivera Principal Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2006 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/28/2006 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |