Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Permit Number - T05SA00402
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/06/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The conditions of approval for variance case C10-04-30 require review and approval of the landscape plan by the DRB. Provide documentation of the required review and approval. |
| 12/08/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Add the SCZ case number (SCZ 05-21) to all sheets. Add the date of SCZ approval and any conditions imposed to the Scenic Corridor Zone notes on sheet 2 of 11. |
| 12/28/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings Subdivision SCZ Overlay Submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: T05SA00402 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat sheets, NPPO plans, landscape documents, elevation details, and overlay application were received on November 17, 2005. Several comments pertaining to SCZ provided from the Tentative Plat submittal comment letters still remain. Address the following SCZ comments: SCZ OVERLAY COMMENTS: 1) Land Use Code Section (LUC) 2.8.2.2: For the SCZ submittal address the following: a) DS Sec.11-01.9.3: Per sheet 3 and detail 5 sheet 10, there is a proposed 13 to 15 ft high 1:1(H:V) fill slope adjacent to lots 13 and 14 along the north property line which can be viewed from Silverbell Road. This exposed slope is within the 400-ft Scenic Corridor Zone. Only 10 feet is shown for this runout and slope construction along the north boundary adjacent to lot 13, and the detail does not show slope setback. Revise slope design on planview sheet 3 and detail 5 on sheet 10 to show how runout, setback, and construction for this slope will be accommodated within the project boundary. Provide consideration for the slope setback (of between 6 - 8 feet) per this section of the development standards. b) LUC 3.7.5.2.E: All slopes within the 400-ft Scenic Corridor Zone along the north, west and south grading boundary shall meet SCZ exposed slope requirements. Per this section of the land use code, exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1(H:V), however it is acknowledged that with the variance steeper slopes may be allowed. In Tentative Plat comment letters there has been a request for a soils report for this project yet none have been submitted until the latest Tentative Plat submittal, in which there was a two-page geotechnical evaluation with boring data for only the north half of the project. In this document there is recommendations for fill of 7 to 10 feet however the fill is greater for areas of this project. Submit a geotechnical report that addresses the following: i) The report shall reflect the whole project site and provide geotechnical discussion of feasibility of project ii) Provide recommendations for slope stability for proposed slopes steeper than 3:1(H:V). iii) Assess geotechnical acceptance of details 3, 4, 9, and 10 on sheet 10, i.e. if there are any minimum distances between lot wall and top of 1:1(H:V) slope, or tree well recommendations. c) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.6: Regarding the variance, address the following comments: i) Provide an explanation in a response letter for this SCZ submittal, how the proposed buffer area and common area along the frontage shown on the tentative plat matches the copy of referenced plan for the variance. ii) In the drainage concept exhibit for the variance, the slopes are labeled as hand placed rip rap; label slope details to include "hand placed". iii) The proposed improvements along the frontage have been revised to show rip rap slopes with tree wells. Submit a copy of the drainage report and provide a statement (indicate page in response letter) that the slope and channel improvements along the frontage of the project provides conveyance of the flows along the Scenic Corridor and is the minimal amount of disturbance for the 30-ft SCZ buffer per variance conditions D and H. 2) DS Sec.3.7.5.2.A: Revise NPPO sheets to match updated Tentative Plat sheets; in particular, remove areas of proposed riprap in the Camino De Oeste wash. Submit a revised Tentative Plat, a bound copy of the project geotechnical report, response letter, and any other supporting documentation. The next submittal should address all the above SCZ items. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/29/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 29, 2005 Steven W. Hill Leadstar Engineering Company, LLC 1010 Finance Center Drive Tucson, Arizona 85710 Subject: T05SA00402 Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay for Silverbell Crossing (S04-188) Dear Richard: Your submittal of November 17, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Scenic Corridor Overlay zone submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Zoning, Landscape, DSD). Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |