Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Permit Number - T05SA00344
Review Name: LUCAPPS - OVERLAY ZONE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Staff has reviewed the application and does not recommend approval at this time. The following comments are intended to assist the applicant to modify the plans to meet the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.2. 1) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to establish grading limits to preserve and maintain the required thirty-foot buffer area in a natural state. While buffer revegetation and reconstruction to look as natural as possible is a permitted improvement, grading is not. Clearing of weeds and contouring to promote water harvesting may be allowed as part of the SCZ review, but the grading limits should not extend into the buffer. LUC 2.8.2.4.A 2) The scenic route buffer area is to be reconstructed to look as natural as possible. The use of decomposed granite along scenic routes is not permitted. The provisions for dust control and revegetation are to include a native seed mix using plants indigenous to the immediate area. The adjacent unpaved right-of-way along Silverbell Road must also be revegetated with native plants. LUC 3.7.5.2.D Revise the plans to specify an appropriate seed mix, rather than d.g. 4) Revise Section E on sheet 2 of the tentative plat to show the 30" scenic route buffer area, rather than "300' SCZ". 5) Revise Section E on sheet 2 of the tentative plat to indicate existing grade for the thirty-foot scenic route buffer area rather than "3:1 max. slopes. Beyond the thirty-foot buffer slopes should be 3:1 max. 6) Revise the tentative plat to rename the "SCZ Buffer" line to SCZ Overlay Zone, in order to avoid confusion with the 30' SCZ buffer. 7) The landscape plan includes Dasylirion wheelerii in the scenic route buffer area. If this plant is not indigenous to the immediate area it should be excluded from the buffer. 8) Additional plantings should be incorporated into the scenic route buffer area to create a natural presentation, and to blend with the surroundings. The addition of the seed mix (comment #2) should assist in the restoration, but additional plants may be necessary. |
| 11/18/2005 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Please see zoning review comments under tentative plat. |
| 11/30/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 30, 2005 Kelly Houston Pathway Developments 6885 North Oracle Road Tucson, Arizona 85704 Subject: T05SA00344 Scenic Corridor Overlay for Silverbell Residential Subdivision Dear Greg: Your submittal of October 6, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay submittal package as detailed in the on line comments (Engineering, Landscape, DSD). Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 795-5211 |
| 11/30/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | (reviewed earlier but not posted; delivered to Zoning 10OCT05) DATE: October 10, 2005 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Silverbell Residential Subdivision Overlay Review Submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S05-093 SUMMARY: The Scenic Corridor submittal was submitted for review with supplemental phased Tentative Plat and preliminary Grading Plan. Development Services Department Engineering Division has reviewed the received items and recommends approval of the Scenic Corridor Overlay submittal for Phase 1 only. The Grading Plan and Tentative Plat documents were reviewed for Scenic Corridor purposes only. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |