Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T05PI00030
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2006 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | UTILITY AWARENESS NOTIFICATION | Completed | PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and Drainage Report and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The Drainage Report is reviewed for improvements in the public rights of way (ROW). The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. The attached comments are based on the information provided and is not meant as an all inclusive list of items that must be addressed but a check for general conformance to City Standards. The Engineer of Record (The Engineer preparing and certifying the plans, in this case Stantec Consulting) is responsible for the plans/design meeting all applicable Standards, Codes, Ordinances, and for any issues errors and/or omissions. 1. Submit an approved (by DSD) revised drainage report analyzing how the proposed improvements in the ROW will impact existing drainage. How will the placement of vertical curb effect flows? Provide a hydrological analysis of the storm drains across driveway entrances and sidewalk scuppers. 2. Sheet 2: Detail 5/2: Indicate the minimum pavement and aggregate base thickness per a geotechnical report. Existing pavement section must be matched, if existing pavement section is greater. 3. Sheet 3, Detail 4/3: Indicate a minimum of 2' (2% slope) from the edge of the pedestrian path and the top of the slope. 4. Sheet 6, Keynote 39: Provide Curb Access Ramp detail on plan set and indicate the use of truncated domes as the detectable warning device. Please see attached detail. 5. Key note 42: Indicate the use of truncated domes as the detectable warning device. |
| 01/05/2006 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/09/2006 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
| 01/09/2006 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed | |
| 12/15/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/20/2005 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2005 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | We have reviewed these plans and have the following comments: 1. Sheet 2 of 8 - 5/2 - There should be a minimum pavement and aggregate base course thickness specified. If the existing is greater, then the contractor can match. 2. Sheets 3 - 5 of 8 - Note 25 - Please clarify that this is 12" concrete header per STD 213. No further comments. 12/23/05 |
| 12/30/2005 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and Drainage Report and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The Drainage Report is reviewed for improvements in the public rights of way (ROW). The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. The attached comments are based on the information provided and is not meant as an all inclusive list of items that must be addressed but a check for general conformance to City Standards. The Engineer of Record (The Engineer preparing and certifying the plans, in this case Stantec Consulting) is responsible for the plans/design meeting all applicable Standards, Codes, Ordinances, and for any issues errors and/or omissions. 1. Submit an approved (by DSD) revised drainage report analyzing how the proposed improvements in the ROW will impact existing drainage. How will the placement of vertical curb effect flows? Provide a hydrological analysis of the storm drains across driveway entrances and sidewalk scuppers. 2. Sheet 2: Detail 5/2: Indicate the minimum pavement and aggregate base thickness per a geotechnical report. Existing pavement section must be matched, if existing pavement section is greater. 3. Sheet 3, Detail 4/3: Indicate a minimum of 2' (2% slope) from the edge of the pedestrian path and the top of the slope. 4. Sheet 6, Keynote 39: Provide Curb Access Ramp detail on plan set and indicate the use of truncated domes as the detectable warning device. Please see attached detail. 5. Key note 42: Indicate the use of truncated domes as the detectable warning device. |