Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T05PI00020
Review Name: PIA RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2005 | RICHARD LEIGH | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | November 8, 2005 TO: DSD PIA Coordinator SUBJECT: Desert Stone - Phase 2, Paving Plans, T05PI00020 S04-064 PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Senior Engineering Associate Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Paving Plans. The Engineering - Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and Drainage Report and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. The attached comments are based on the information provided and are not meant as an all inclusive list of items that must be addressed but a check for general conformance to City Standards. The Engineer of Record (The Engineer preparing and certifying the plans, in this case MMLA, Inc.) is responsible for the plans/design meeting all applicable Standards, Codes, Ordinances, and for any issues errors and/or omissions. 1. Sheet 1: Provide the final plat recordation information (Book and Page) on cover sheet. 2. Sheet 5: A sidewalk scupper must be provides between lots 244 and 245 per DS 3-01.2.8. If stormwater flows will be conveyed over the sidewalk a DSMR will have to be applied for. If a 3. Sheet 5: The cross section call out shown between lots 234 and 235 refers to a super elevated cross section while the profile indicates a crowned roadway section. 4. Sheet 6: Modify the Scupper Detail to more accurately depict Standard Detail 205.5, please refer to redlines. Additionally, provide a detail for the curb transition from wedge curb to vertical curb. 5. Sheet 6: The curb access ramp details do not accurately depict the projects lay out. The detail indicates the cub is abutting the sidewalk. Additionally, label the maximum slopes, provide a vertical cub (6" reveal) at the back of the ramp, remove finish requirement and provide a cross section of the ramp. If you have any questions, or if you wish to meet, I can be reached at 791-3115 ext.448 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/15/2005 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/16/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/17/2005 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Approved | We have reviewed these plans and have no comments. The previous concerns have been addressed. Approved 11/17/05 |
| 11/18/2005 | THAD HARVISON | DOT ENGINEERING | UTILITY AWARENESS NOTIFICATION | Passed | November 8, 2005 TO: DSD PIA Coordinator SUBJECT: Desert Stone - Phase 2, Paving Plans, T05PI00020 S04-064 PROJECT REVIEWER: Richard Leigh, Senior Engineering Associate Permits and Codes Section RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Paving Plans. The Engineering - Permits and Codes Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and Drainage Report and does not recommend approval of the PIA Plan at this time. The following review comments need to be addressed in the next submittal. The attached comments are based on the information provided and are not meant as an all inclusive list of items that must be addressed but a check for general conformance to City Standards. The Engineer of Record (The Engineer preparing and certifying the plans, in this case MMLA, Inc.) is responsible for the plans/design meeting all applicable Standards, Codes, Ordinances, and for any issues errors and/or omissions. 1. Sheet 1: Provide the final plat recordation information (Book and Page) on cover sheet. 2. Sheet 5: A sidewalk scupper must be provides between lots 244 and 245 per DS 3-01.2.8. If stormwater flows will be conveyed over the sidewalk a DSMR will have to be applied for. If a 3. Sheet 5: The cross section call out shown between lots 234 and 235 refers to a super elevated cross section while the profile indicates a crowned roadway section. 4. Sheet 6: Modify the Scupper Detail to more accurately depict Standard Detail 205.5, please refer to redlines. Additionally, provide a detail for the curb transition from wedge curb to vertical curb. 5. Sheet 6: The curb access ramp details do not accurately depict the projects lay out. The detail indicates the cub is abutting the sidewalk. Additionally, label the maximum slopes, provide a vertical cub (6" reveal) at the back of the ramp, remove finish requirement and provide a cross section of the ramp. If you have any questions, or if you wish to meet, I can be reached at 791-3115 ext.448 or Richard.Leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/23/2005 | DALE KELCH | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this PIA submittal: 1. Add W14-2 sign to project ingress. 2. Label W14-2 signs for the cul-de-sacs on sheets 2, 3. I know that the signs are labeled on sheet 4. Label on sheets 2, 3 also. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/25/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSADOR | Completed | |
| 11/25/2005 | TAMI ACHONG | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |